2007
DOI: 10.3136/nskkk.54.209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid and Simple Detection of Coliform Bacteria in Milk Using Menadione-Catalyzed Luminol Chemiluminescence Assay

Abstract: Menadione-catalyzed luminol chemiluminescence assay was evaluated for rapid detection of coliform bacteria in milk. The assay was evaluated using raw milk (non-pasteurized) samples and pasteurized milk samples spiked with Escherichia coli, Enterobacter aerogenes, Klebsiella oxytoca, Citrobacter freundii. The detection limit in this assay was +* / ῌ+*. CFU/ml using a 30-well plate with BGLB broth. Our study revealed that coliform contamination of +* + ῌ+* * CFU/ml of milk could be detected after +2 h of incubat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in pasteurised milk products. Compared with other published methods for the detection of re-contaminants in pasteurised milk products (Firstenberg-Eden et al, 2002;Kawasaki et al, 2007;Nicolaou & Goodacre, 2008;Ren & Hsieh, 2005;Soejima et al, 2012a), this method covers a broader range of re-contaminants within acceptable time periods. In addition, the sub-cultivation of isolates for further pheno-and genotypic analysis is possible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…in pasteurised milk products. Compared with other published methods for the detection of re-contaminants in pasteurised milk products (Firstenberg-Eden et al, 2002;Kawasaki et al, 2007;Nicolaou & Goodacre, 2008;Ren & Hsieh, 2005;Soejima et al, 2012a), this method covers a broader range of re-contaminants within acceptable time periods. In addition, the sub-cultivation of isolates for further pheno-and genotypic analysis is possible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Different microbiological parameters have been analysed using novel cultural techniques in pasteurised milk: coliforms (Foschino, Colombo, Crepaldi, & Baldi, 2003;Kang & Gray, 2002;Madden & Gilmour, 1995;Raybaudi, Zea, Curini, & Martínez, 2005), Pseudomonas species (Van Tassell et al, 2012), Escherichia coli and coliforms (Beloti, Barros, Nunes, De Santana, & Nero, 2002;Feldsine et al, 2005), total bacterial counts and coliforms (Ginn, Packard, & Fox, 1986), standard plate counts, psychrotrophic bacterial counts, and coliforms (Senyk, Kozlowski, Noar, Shipe, & Bandler, 1987) and total viable counts, coliforms, and Enterobacteriaceae (Firstenberg-Eden, Foti, McDougal, & Baker, 2002). Furthermore, novel detection techniques and procedures have been presented for the detection of recontaminants in pasteurised milk, such as the determination of microbial activity using a microrespirometer (Ren & Hsieh, 2005), the detection of coliforms by menadione-catalysed luminol chemiluminescence (Kawasaki et al, 2007), the detection of microbial spoilage of milk using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics (Nicolaou & Goodacre, 2008), the application of a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation timeof-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) and multivariate analysis (Nicolaou, Xu, & Goodacre, 2012), and finally the specific detection of total viable coliforms, as well as viable Enterobacteriaceae, by PCR-based techniques (Soejima, Minami, Ayeshima, & Iwatsuki, 2012a;Soejima, Minami, Yaeshima, & Iwatsuki, 2012b). However, these methods are neither capable of detecting very low numbers of re-contaminants nor do they cover the spectrum of microbes, which may play some role under practical conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a simple, rapid, and accurate detection method is desirable. Several non-culture methods have been used for the rapid detection of bacteria in food (Fujikawa and Morozuki, 2003;Gracias and Mckillip, 2004;Kawasaki et al, 2004;Kawasaki et al, 2007;Masuda-Nishimura et al, 2000;Miyamoto et al, 1998). PCR is a useful technique because of its high sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%