1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90866-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomised controlled trial of vitamin E in patients with coronary disease: Cambridge Heart Antioxidant Study (CHAOS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
477
1
12

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,911 publications
(499 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
7
477
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, antioxidant therapy has been successful for the above cardiometabolic disorders by clinical trials or basical science studies 51, 52, 53, 54, 55. Additonally, Keyamura et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, antioxidant therapy has been successful for the above cardiometabolic disorders by clinical trials or basical science studies 51, 52, 53, 54, 55. Additonally, Keyamura et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the GISSI-Prevenzione trial [77], using higher doses of vitamin E (300 mg/d), the mortality group was similar to the placebo group. In contrast, the rate of nonfatal myocardial infarctions was significantly reduced in the CHAOS study using 400 and 800 IU of vitamin E per day [78]. Vitamin E is nontoxic [79] and in animal experiments has been shown to be neither mutagenic, teratogenic, nor carcinogenic.…”
Section: Vitamin Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well established that subclinical heart disease is associated with abnormal acute-phase markers e.g. low albumin (Phillips et al 1989;Kuller et al 1991;Gillum & Makuc, 1992), elevated fibrinogen (Yarnell et al 1991) and leucocyte counts (Sipe, 1985), thus it is possible that subclinical disease may in some way reduce the available vitamin E. Furthermore, there is also some evidence which suggests that vitamin E supplementation was of benefit in preventing new attacks of IHD in a secondary prevention trial (Stephens et al 1996). Nevertheless, a study from my own laboratory, which examined blood from 200 randomly-selected subjects in Belfast and Toulouse, found absolutely no difference in either vitamin E or vitamin E : cholesterol between the the urban group were from Chiang Mai, the rural group from a district approximately 120…”
Section: Vitamin Ementioning
confidence: 99%