2004 International Conferce on Test
DOI: 10.1109/test.2004.1386966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random and systematic defect analysis using IDDQ signature analysis for understanding fails and guiding test decisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4a illustrates the time behaviour of the I DDQ (with normalised current units) for two different patterns of the defective device. Similar timedependent I DDQ behaviour has been previously observed [6]. The two considered patterns activate the defect and set the faulty net to a logic value opposite to that of the defect-free case.…”
Section: Full Open Defect Modelsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…4a illustrates the time behaviour of the I DDQ (with normalised current units) for two different patterns of the defective device. Similar timedependent I DDQ behaviour has been previously observed [6]. The two considered patterns activate the defect and set the faulty net to a logic value opposite to that of the defect-free case.…”
Section: Full Open Defect Modelsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The information contained in current signatures [12], [19]- [20] can facilitate defect diagnosis, and specially, the diagnosis of bridging defects. A real example is illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Current Signatures Of Bridging Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6] and [7] all measurements are compared collectively as a current signature, analogous to the delay-test signature used in [4], which was found to be more robust than individual comparisons. A different data representation is used in [8], where the author proposes detecting outliers using current ratios between a samples minimum and maximum measurement.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%