2009
DOI: 10.1002/tax.584008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rampant non­monophyly of species in Kniphofia Moench (Asphodelaceae) suggests a recent Afromontane radiation

Abstract: The genus Kniphofia, comprising 71 species, has an African­Malagasy distribution, with one species from Yemen. The genus is found predominantly in moist temperate montane grassland and has its centre of diversity in the Drakensberg region of southern Africa. The genus has a complex alpha taxonomy and species relationships are poorly understood. Using a multiple exemplar approach, DNA sequence data from the chloroplast trnT­L spacer and the nuclear internal transcribed spacer region were used in an attempt to r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some cases, such as the genus Kniphofia, all tested species have been shown to be paraphyletic (Ramdhani et al, 2009). The potential explanations for the occurrence of paraphyletic species have attracted much attention (Meimberg et al, 2010;Ramdhani et al, 2009;Rieseberg and Brouillet, 1994). A simple approach is to argue that only monophyletic species should be recognized (Baum and Donoghue, 1995;Mishler and Theriot, 2000), or that the concepts of mono-or paraphyly do not apply to species (Davis and Nixon, 1992).…”
Section: Species Circumscription In Larger Complexesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In some cases, such as the genus Kniphofia, all tested species have been shown to be paraphyletic (Ramdhani et al, 2009). The potential explanations for the occurrence of paraphyletic species have attracted much attention (Meimberg et al, 2010;Ramdhani et al, 2009;Rieseberg and Brouillet, 1994). A simple approach is to argue that only monophyletic species should be recognized (Baum and Donoghue, 1995;Mishler and Theriot, 2000), or that the concepts of mono-or paraphyly do not apply to species (Davis and Nixon, 1992).…”
Section: Species Circumscription In Larger Complexesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These results may be expected, as reviews by Crisp and Chandler (1996) and Funk and Omland (2003) suggest that paraphyletic species may be quite common and indeed their surveys produced rather similar percentages of paraphyletic species (23% of all tested species being paraphyletic). In some cases, such as the genus Kniphofia, all tested species have been shown to be paraphyletic (Ramdhani et al, 2009). The potential explanations for the occurrence of paraphyletic species have attracted much attention (Meimberg et al, 2010;Ramdhani et al, 2009;Rieseberg and Brouillet, 1994).…”
Section: Species Circumscription In Larger Complexesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This seems unlikely, but could be readily tested by common-garden experiments. Secondly, the lack of sequence divergence could be an expression of lineage sorting, as has been postulated in several other southern African taxa (Pleines et al 2009;Ramdhani et al 2009;Ramdhani et al 2010), where the morpho-anatomical divergence may be from a genetically diverse ancestor. However, the lack of phylogenetic structure is not due to conflicting patterns (as would be indicative if the ancestral lineages had different copies of the loci) but lack of sequence divergence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%