2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.01.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radioluminescence for in situ materials characterization: First results on SiC for fusion applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same asymmetrical peak was also found in the 4H-SiC homoepitaxial layer grown by CVD [ 26 ]. Our measurement result is also consistent with M. Malo’s measurement [ 27 ], where IBIL was used to measure reaction bonded (RB) SiC and CVD SiC with 1 MeV H + ions, and he obtained the IBIL spectrum with a broad band emission and the peak lying at approximately 597 nm. The peak at 2.95 eV (420 nm), which is attributed to the D I defect, is also analyzed, and the position and FWHM of the fitted Gaussian peaks at the 2.95 eV band did not depend on fluence from 1.14 × 10 11 to 1.3 × 10 13 ions/cm 2 and were 2.95–2.957 eV and 0.0688–0.0728 eV, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The same asymmetrical peak was also found in the 4H-SiC homoepitaxial layer grown by CVD [ 26 ]. Our measurement result is also consistent with M. Malo’s measurement [ 27 ], where IBIL was used to measure reaction bonded (RB) SiC and CVD SiC with 1 MeV H + ions, and he obtained the IBIL spectrum with a broad band emission and the peak lying at approximately 597 nm. The peak at 2.95 eV (420 nm), which is attributed to the D I defect, is also analyzed, and the position and FWHM of the fitted Gaussian peaks at the 2.95 eV band did not depend on fluence from 1.14 × 10 11 to 1.3 × 10 13 ions/cm 2 and were 2.95–2.957 eV and 0.0688–0.0728 eV, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For the same type of material, experiments performed at IMR, Sendai (Japan) during collaborative experiments for 1 MeV proton irradiation show that comparable results are obtained using very different systems, energies, temperatures and dose rates if compared as a function of ionizing dose (fig.4), suggesting a general use of this technique for different irradiation conditions is feasible[9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%