2009
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radio astrometry with chromatic AGN core positions

Abstract: Aims. The effect of frequency-dependent AGN core positions ("core-shifts") on radio Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) global astrometry measurements is investigated. Methods. The basic equations relating to VLBI astrometry are reviewed, including the effects of source structure. A power-law representation of core-shifts, based on both observations and theoretical considerations of jet conditions, is incorporated. Results. It is shown that, in the presence of core-shifts, phase and group-delay astrometry… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is expected as the radio emission in B1422+231 is slightly extended and is likely not to originate in the accretion disk (as observed in the optical range) but rather from a nearby region at the basis of the radio jet. This effect, known as core-shift, is observed between two different radio-bands (Porcas 2009;Kovalev et al 2008) and may induce astrometric perturbations as large as a few mas on the relative astrometry of lensed quasar images (Mittal et al 2006). Thus, it appears that the use of radio data as an independant calibrator of the systematic errors is difficult at such an accuracy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is expected as the radio emission in B1422+231 is slightly extended and is likely not to originate in the accretion disk (as observed in the optical range) but rather from a nearby region at the basis of the radio jet. This effect, known as core-shift, is observed between two different radio-bands (Porcas 2009;Kovalev et al 2008) and may induce astrometric perturbations as large as a few mas on the relative astrometry of lensed quasar images (Mittal et al 2006). Thus, it appears that the use of radio data as an independant calibrator of the systematic errors is difficult at such an accuracy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such offsets are expected for several reasons: i) the observations were conducted at different frequencies; ii) the different campaigns used different calibrator sources, which may have different systematic errors (e.g. Kovalev et al 2008;Porcas 2009;Sokolovsky et al 2011) in their ties to the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF2, Ma et al 2009); iii) the data were obtained at times that are up to ten years apart during which improvements to the correlator models and Earth orientation parameters introduce offsets; and iv) the data were taken with different instruments (VLBA and EVN) that use different hardware/software correlators. Table 5 summarizes the estimates of µ and π from the individual fits, from the different combinations of data sets, and from the bootstrapping method (where we quote the most compact 68% confidence interval), as well as the implied pulsar distances and transverse velocities.…”
Section: Estimates For Astrometric Parameters Of B1929+10 B2020+28 mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Popović et al 2012;Porcas 2009;Taris et al 2011). Linear trends of these shifts might lead to spurious proper motions measured for quasars and stable over years to decades.…”
Section: Spurious Proper Motion From Variable Source Structurementioning
confidence: 99%