2015
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the birth locations of pulsars B1929+10, B2020+28, and B2021+51

Abstract: We present new proper motion and parallax measurements obtained with the European VLBI Network (EVN) at 5 GHz for the three isolated pulsars B1929+10, B2020+28, and B2021+51. For B1929+10 we combined our data with earlier VLBI measurements and confirm the robustness of the astrometric parameters of this pulsar. For pulsars B2020+28 and B2021+51 our observations indicate that both stars are almost a factor of two closer to the solar system than previously thought, placing them at a distance of 1.39 +0.05 −0.06 … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a situation is not unusual (Yao et al 2017). For instance, the very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) parallax measurements for two pulsars revealed 65% lower distances than followed from the NE2001 model (Kirsten et al 2015). Subsequent extensive VLBI parallax analysis of 57 pulsar under the PSRπ project also suggests that the accuracy of the DM-based distance predictions is significantly overestimated (Deller et al 2018).…”
Section: Pulsar Distance and The Galactic Electron Density Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a situation is not unusual (Yao et al 2017). For instance, the very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) parallax measurements for two pulsars revealed 65% lower distances than followed from the NE2001 model (Kirsten et al 2015). Subsequent extensive VLBI parallax analysis of 57 pulsar under the PSRπ project also suggests that the accuracy of the DM-based distance predictions is significantly overestimated (Deller et al 2018).…”
Section: Pulsar Distance and The Galactic Electron Density Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…van Buren & McCray 1988). It was claimed that this star was part of a binary and was ejected when its companion (now the pulsar PSR B1929+10) exploded as a supernova about 1 Myr ago (van Rensbergen et al 1996;Hoogerwerf et al 2001;Tetzlaff et al 2010), but Kirsten et al (2015) recently refuted this hypothesis. In any case, it appears to be currently single; we found no significant RV variation in the data.…”
Section: C28 Hd 149757mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This worked well only when increasing the error bars for the measured (input) data as they were known at that time (2000) to 10 σ (see also Tetzlaff et al ). Later on, when more precise values for proper motion and parallax of the pulsar became known, including smaller error bars, it did not work well anymore (Bobylev ; Kirsten et al ; Tetzlaff et al ). In this context, it is important to mention that a wide range of RVs (from −35 to +30 km s −1 , as summarized in Table ) have been published for ζ Oph in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%