2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2008.11.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation tolerance of the CMS forward pixel detector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the readout electronics have a detection threshold, a low signal can cause inefficiency. In order to predict the performance for high fluences, sensors have been irradiated and thoroughly investigated with a radioactive source [44] (BPIX) and at a beam test [45] (FPIX). In both cases the results confirmed that the sensors can tolerate the expected radiation doses and collect enough charge with a high efficiency.…”
Section: Sensor Radiation Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the readout electronics have a detection threshold, a low signal can cause inefficiency. In order to predict the performance for high fluences, sensors have been irradiated and thoroughly investigated with a radioactive source [44] (BPIX) and at a beam test [45] (FPIX). In both cases the results confirmed that the sensors can tolerate the expected radiation doses and collect enough charge with a high efficiency.…”
Section: Sensor Radiation Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the sensors collect electrons, after radiation-induced space charge sign inversion, the detector can be still be read out and there is a higher charge collection efficiency. Studies of both the barrel and forward sensors after irradiation have shown there is still sufficient charge after fluences above 10 15 n eq /cm 2 [5,6]. Because of the short timescale for producing a replacement, and as there are not other good options, the plan is to continue to use similar sensors to the present.…”
Section: The Cms Pixel Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The innermost part of the pixel detector is expected to be heavily degraded before the end of the Phase 1 [7,8].…”
Section: Further Development For Late Phasementioning
confidence: 99%