Racialised professionals’ experiences of selective incivility in organisations: A multi-level analysis of subtle racism

Abstract

This article explores how racialised professionals experience selective incivility in UK organisations. Analysing 22 in-depth, semi-structured interviews, we provide multi-level findings that relate to individual, organisational and societal phenomena to illuminate the workings of subtle racism. On the individual level, selective incivility appears as articulated through ascriptions of excess and deficit that marginalise racialised professionals; biased actions by white employees who operate as honest liars or strategic coverers; and white defensiveness against selective incivility claims. On the organisational level, organisational whitewashing, management denial and upstream exclusion constitute the key enablers of selective incivility. On the societal level, dynamic changes relating to increasing intolerance outside organisations indirectly yet sharply fuel selective incivility within organisations. Finally, racialised professionals experience intersectional (dis-)advantages at the imbrications of individual, organisation and society levels, shaping within-group variations in experiences of workplace selective incivility. Throughout all three levels of analysis and their interplay, differences in power and privilege inform the conditions of possibility for and the continual reproduction of selective incivility.

Seeking and avoiding contact with Muslims at a Hijab Stall: Evidence for multilayer, multi‐determined solidarity, courage, apathy, and moral outrage

“…We deliberately accepted some loss in parsimony inherent in our all-encompassing framework and data-driven approach, in exchange of greater appreciation of the empirical complexity of actual socio-psychological processes implicated in contact seeking/ avoidance in real settings. As our multilayer-multivariate effort parallels that in other areas of social research (e.g., Ib añez et al, 2009;Ozturk & Berber, 2020;Steel & Taras, 2010), we see it indicative of a growing zeitgeist that emphasizes integrative and holistic approaches to prediction and explanation. These research trends do not deny the value in analyses of small subsets of predictors of a phenomenon (e.g., in controlled experimental settings); but they help us appreciate the merit of moving away from extreme forms of incrementalism in research and over-reliance on micro-models (for a discussion, see McPhetres et al, 2020).…”

Supervisors’ social dominance orientation, nation-based exchange relationships, and team-level outcomes

“…This unequal treatment may be manifested in several ways. For example, immigrants may experience barriers to career advancement and be subject to jokes, negative comments, and stereotypes that demean their capabilities (Foley et al, 2002;Van Laer and Janssens, 2011;Ozturk and Berber, 2022). This study draws from the above studies and suggest that immigrants may suffer from unequal treatment in terms of exchange relationships with their supervisors.…”

“…This unequal treatment may be manifested in several ways. For example, immigrants may experience barriers to career advancement and be subject to jokes, negative comments, and stereotypes that demean their capabilities ( Foley et al, 2002 ; Van Laer and Janssens, 2011 ; Ozturk and Berber, 2022 ).…”

Editorial: The experience of work and experiential workers: mainline and critical perspectives on employee experience

“…in HRM thinking and practice (e.g. Ashley and Empson, 2013; Di Stasio and Larsen, 2020; Ferrer and Murray, 2020; Ibarra, 2019; Ozturk and Berber, 2020; Ozturk and Tatli, 2018).…”