2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2016.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative limitations to photosynthesis in K deficient sunflower and their implications on water-use efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
55
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
8
55
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This dose increased the organic feedstock, resulting in greater stomatal conductance values of plants, but always lower than the average value of 0.2414 mol m -2 s -1 between the plants irrigated with water of lower salinity ( Figure 1A). This situation, according to Wang et al (2013) and Jákli et al (2017), is a response of the stomatal closure in saline stressed plants, with strategies to reduce water loss through transpiration, as also recorded by Tatagiba et al (2014) and Prazeres et al (2015), who studied photosynthetic limitations of tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum) and cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata) subjected to salt stress ranging from 0 to 15 dS m -1 of NaCl and 0.8 to 5.0 dS m -1 , respectively. The behavior of the data agrees with Freire et al (2014), who concluded that stomatal conductance in yellow passion fruit plants was significantly harmed by increasing water salinity from 0.5 to 4.5 dS m -1 but diverges from Nascimento et al (2011) after verifying that the biofertilizer attenuated the deleterious effects of the salts of the irrigation water due to the improvement of the nutritional state of the plants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This dose increased the organic feedstock, resulting in greater stomatal conductance values of plants, but always lower than the average value of 0.2414 mol m -2 s -1 between the plants irrigated with water of lower salinity ( Figure 1A). This situation, according to Wang et al (2013) and Jákli et al (2017), is a response of the stomatal closure in saline stressed plants, with strategies to reduce water loss through transpiration, as also recorded by Tatagiba et al (2014) and Prazeres et al (2015), who studied photosynthetic limitations of tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum) and cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata) subjected to salt stress ranging from 0 to 15 dS m -1 of NaCl and 0.8 to 5.0 dS m -1 , respectively. The behavior of the data agrees with Freire et al (2014), who concluded that stomatal conductance in yellow passion fruit plants was significantly harmed by increasing water salinity from 0.5 to 4.5 dS m -1 but diverges from Nascimento et al (2011) after verifying that the biofertilizer attenuated the deleterious effects of the salts of the irrigation water due to the improvement of the nutritional state of the plants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This variable, obtained by the ratio between photosynthesis and transpiration, indicates the amount of carbon the plant fixes by the amount of water lost during the transpiration process (Jákli et al, 2017). Thus, the lower values in the WUE are reflections of the increases in the transpiration rate of the plants in the first harvest (Figure 2A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…De acuerdo con el modelo de regresión Ŷ =89,5217 -0,7813N**+0,1634K+0,0049N 2 **-0,0016NK*, se determinó que, para llegar al máximo valor de la g s en albahaca (65,13 mmol CO 2 m -2 s -1 ), se necesitan 190 y 237,5 kg ha -1 de N y K, respectivamente. En ese sentido, Jákli et al (2017) indican que con frecuencia la g s se reduce bajo deficiencia de K; sin embargo, los autores indican que algunos estudios cuestionan la causalidad directa entre la deficiencia de K y el cierre estomático. Por lo tanto, una disminución de la g s no reflejaría necesariamente una baja capacidad para el control de apertura y cierre estomático, pero podría ser el resultado de un ajuste de los estomas a la reducción de la utilización de CO 2 por la fotosíntesis.…”
Section: Resultados Y Discusiónunclassified