1967
DOI: 10.1902/jop.1967.38.6_part1.526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Evaluation of the Plaque‐removing Ability of Different Types of Toothbrushes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
29
0
3

Year Published

1989
1989
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical results from the whole trial population show that increased brushing frequency significantly reduced caries increment for all treatment groups (Burchell et al, 1987). While many studies have demonstrated that toothbrushing does not remove all plaque (Bay et al, 1967;Horowitz and Suomi, 1974;Schmid et al, 1976), the lack of consistency of the plaque fluoride data with brushing frequency could arise from differences in the amounts of plaque in the mouth during and soon after brushing, when the most favorable concentration gradient for fluoride uptake exists. A more comprehensive study of brushing habits is required before any firm conclusion can be reached.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical results from the whole trial population show that increased brushing frequency significantly reduced caries increment for all treatment groups (Burchell et al, 1987). While many studies have demonstrated that toothbrushing does not remove all plaque (Bay et al, 1967;Horowitz and Suomi, 1974;Schmid et al, 1976), the lack of consistency of the plaque fluoride data with brushing frequency could arise from differences in the amounts of plaque in the mouth during and soon after brushing, when the most favorable concentration gradient for fluoride uptake exists. A more comprehensive study of brushing habits is required before any firm conclusion can be reached.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the lingual molar area the tongue on the lingual aspect of molar may interfere in using the brush. 20 When the mean difference in the gingival index and plaque index among the three groups was calculated, triple headed toothbrush showed a significant difference (p < 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is similar to the study conducted by Gibson et al 11 The mean plaque scores of all the teeth except third molars for each individual for each visit were assessed. This provided more sensitive and accurate evaluation of brushing effectiveness compared with methods used in other studies like Bay et al 6 and Scopp et al 8 where only designated teeth were assessed. However, samples and different toothbrush bristle designs used in the present study were very less.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Plaque was assessed on the buccal and lingual surfaces of all teeth except the third molars using the two-tone disclosing solution. Each of the toothbrushes was given a code.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%