2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2017.11.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative assessment of submicron scale anisotropy in tissue multifractality by scattering Mueller matrix in the framework of Born approximation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Stokes vector components (second and third components) deal with azimuth and ellipticity along with estimation of the polarization ellipticity through the fourth component of Stokes vector. The normal and diabetic kidney samples are well differentiated through the Stokes‐correlometry parameters dealing with phase and modulus of the polarization inhomogeneous images for the kidney samples of both type of tissue where the phase shift change is observed due to the various size of the birefringent fibrils and their curvilinearity and shows the fractal nature of the specimen. In this study, the different nature of refractive index of the biological specimen for the linear, linear‐45 and circular polarization has not taken into consideration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The Stokes vector components (second and third components) deal with azimuth and ellipticity along with estimation of the polarization ellipticity through the fourth component of Stokes vector. The normal and diabetic kidney samples are well differentiated through the Stokes‐correlometry parameters dealing with phase and modulus of the polarization inhomogeneous images for the kidney samples of both type of tissue where the phase shift change is observed due to the various size of the birefringent fibrils and their curvilinearity and shows the fractal nature of the specimen. In this study, the different nature of refractive index of the biological specimen for the linear, linear‐45 and circular polarization has not taken into consideration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…All elements of MM are real numbers, MM contains full information on polarimetric properties of the sample in the absence of non-linear effects. In the recently published studies, MM polarimetry has been applied to differentiating the polycrystalline structure of healthy and pathologically altered tissues of myocardium [13], characterization of rectum wall tissue, vaginal wall during genital prolapse, brain tissue [14], detection of healthy and pre-cancerous regions of uterine cervix tissue [15][16][17], blood films characterization for cancer diagnosis [18], detection of cancer of colorectal tissue [19,20] and characterization of other tissues [21,22]. Other polarization-based techniques, such as Stokes polarimetry based on circularly polarized illumination [23,24], Jones-matrix tomography [25,26], Stokes correlometry [27] were also widely used for the characterization of various tissues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HE optically-based polarimetry is popular experimental approach widely used for non-invasive diagnosis of various turbid tissue-like scattering media [1][2][3][4][5][6], including those containing optically anisotropic layers [7][8][9] and fluids [10][11][12]. With the recent instrumentation developments in the field, a high sensitivity of laser polarimetry in screening of turbid cancerous biological tissues has been achieved [13][14][15][16]. The further development of this approach is based on the statistical analysis of averaged values of the polarization parameters (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%