2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative analysis on the impact of nuclear energy supply disruption on electricity supply security

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It must be noted that the intracity transport energy intensity in Kawasaki and Tokyo has increased from 2010 to 2015 although the modal split has not changed much. This might be because the fossil fuel contributes to the greater share in electricity mix after the Fukushima nuclear accident [61] and this causes the increase in the transport energy intensity of electric train. Therefore, the main cause of the decrease in regression coefficient with time in 1987-2015 presented in Table 3 would be because the intracity transport energy intensity of each city continuously increased under the case of low population density while it slightly increased under the case of medium population density and remained almost the same in the case of high population density.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It must be noted that the intracity transport energy intensity in Kawasaki and Tokyo has increased from 2010 to 2015 although the modal split has not changed much. This might be because the fossil fuel contributes to the greater share in electricity mix after the Fukushima nuclear accident [61] and this causes the increase in the transport energy intensity of electric train. Therefore, the main cause of the decrease in regression coefficient with time in 1987-2015 presented in Table 3 would be because the intracity transport energy intensity of each city continuously increased under the case of low population density while it slightly increased under the case of medium population density and remained almost the same in the case of high population density.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must be noted that the intracity transport energy intensity in Kawasaki and Tokyo has increased from 2010 to 2015 although the modal split has not changed much. This might be because the fossil fuel contributes to the greater share in electricity mix after the Fukushima nuclear accident [61] and this causes the increase in the transport energy intensity of electric train.…”
Section: Relationship Between Intracity Transport Energy Intensity Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, system modeling of the electrical system at the national scale by employing System Dynamics has already been validated through the comparison of the real grid in Japan [24]. This earlier research paper also conducted the parametric analysis using the real capacity of the energy source.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Energy Security Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo, el riesgo no es inexistente. Un accidente nuclear puede poner en riesgo el suministro de energía, lo que podría evitarse mediante la redundancia de instalaciones y la diversificación (Kosai & Unesaki, 2017), aunque encarecería la generación de energía. Más gravemente que el abastecimiento, podría resultar afectada la salud de los seres vivos en amplios rangos de distancias respecto al lugar del accidente y en varias generaciones (Lyman, 2011).…”
Section: Los Inconvenientes De La Energía Nuclearunclassified