2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying uncertainty in brain-predicted age using scalar-on-image quantile regression

Abstract: Prediction of subject age from brain anatomical MRI has the potential to provide a sensitive summary of brain changes, indicative of different neurodegenerative diseases. However, existing studies typically neglect the uncertainty of these predictions. In this work we take into account this uncertainty by applying methods of functional data analysis. We propose a penalised functional quantile regression model of age on brain structure with cognitively normal (CN) subjects in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimagin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantile regression introduced by Koenker and Bassett, 1978 ) and developed Koenker and Hallock ( 2001 ) does not require economic variables sequence to conform to a normal distribution. Quantile regression determines the model for the selected quantities in the conditional distribution of the dependent variable (Palma et al 2020 ; Sirin and Yilmaz 2020 ; Xu and Lin 2020 ). Hence traditionally, the linear regression model is expressed as the linear regression model equation as follows: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantile regression introduced by Koenker and Bassett, 1978 ) and developed Koenker and Hallock ( 2001 ) does not require economic variables sequence to conform to a normal distribution. Quantile regression determines the model for the selected quantities in the conditional distribution of the dependent variable (Palma et al 2020 ; Sirin and Yilmaz 2020 ; Xu and Lin 2020 ). Hence traditionally, the linear regression model is expressed as the linear regression model equation as follows: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCCQR outperforms RVR in the MACS and IXI datasets. Note that incorporating epistemic or aleatory uncertainty alone -as has recently been suggested [20] for brain-age models -systematically underestimates uncertainty (see Supplementary Figure S1).…”
Section: Uncertainty Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…For high-dimensional inputs, however, uncertainty estimation becomes exceedingly difficult using these methods. This has sparked a plethora of research into alternative approaches, especially for neural networks [18,19,20]. While interesting, most of these approaches do not consider aleatory and epistemic uncertainty together and none have been applied to brain-age research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This estimate provides a useful summary of the large voxelwise spaces generated by standard high-resolution T 1 -w scans into a single interpretable value. The difference between the predicted brain-age and the true chronological age is a versatile measure that has been associated with cognitive ability (Cole et al, 2019b;Cole, 2020) as well as clinical status and severity, with significantly "older" brain-ages associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI) (Cole et al, 2015), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) (Palma et al, 2020). Furthermore, predicted brain-age could be a better predictor of disease risk than chronological age (Franke and Gaser, 2019;Cole, 2020).…”
Section: Quantitative Comparison Of Epimix and Standard T 1 Contrastsmentioning
confidence: 99%