2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18118-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying net loss of global mangrove carbon stocks from 20 years of land cover change

Abstract: Mangrove forests hold some of the highest densities of carbon recorded in any ecosystem, but have experienced widespread deforestation through conversion to aquaculture and agriculture. Alongside deforestation, mangroves have shown simultaneous natural expansion in some parts of the world, and considerable investments have been made into restoration programmes. Here we estimate net changes in the global mangrove carbon stock due to land cover change between 1996 and 2016, using data on mangrove deforestation a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(99 reference statements)
1
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We assumed that future loss rates due to each of the five drivers were proportional to their historical contributions. Therefore, our predictions may overestimate emissions in regions where mangrove deforestation rates are slowing because of policy changes (Friess, Krauss, et al, 2020, Friess, Yando, et al, 2020; Richards et al, 2020). Changes in the magnitude of drivers of mangrove loss are likely to occur in the future, implying that our assumption of linearity in predictions may not happen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We assumed that future loss rates due to each of the five drivers were proportional to their historical contributions. Therefore, our predictions may overestimate emissions in regions where mangrove deforestation rates are slowing because of policy changes (Friess, Krauss, et al, 2020, Friess, Yando, et al, 2020; Richards et al, 2020). Changes in the magnitude of drivers of mangrove loss are likely to occur in the future, implying that our assumption of linearity in predictions may not happen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We assumed that future loss rates due to each of the five drivers were proportional to their historical contributions. Therefore, our predictions may overestimate emissions in regions where mangrove deforestation rates are slowing because of policy changes (Friess, Krauss, et al, 2020Richards et al, 2020). Changes in the magnitude of drivers of mangrove loss are F I G U R E 3 Emission reductions (Tg CO 2 eq ) that could be achieved from (a) management of agriculture/aquaculture and shore stabilisation in the West Coral Triangle and (b) decrease in erosion through shore stabilisation, mangrove protection to avoid clearing and restoration of mangroves affected by tropical storms in the Tropical Northwest Atlantic likely to occur in the future, implying that our assumption of linearity in predictions may not happen.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Predictions To Input Data Sources and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we still need to better understand the patterns derived from the fragmentation process through multi-temporal analyses and high-resolution mapping efforts, which are urgently needed. These efforts would benefit from employing open-access satellite imagery, cloud-computing (e.g., Bhargava et al, 2020), or the available open access multitemporal global layers (e.g., Thomas et al, 2017;Bunting et al, 2018;Bryan-Brown et al, 2020;Richards et al, 2020). Efforts must concentrate around protected, urban and peri-urban areas, as well as on to assess the effectiveness of conservation efforts and to identify threats and deforestation hotspots.…”
Section: Mangroves As Fragmented Habitats In the Anthropocenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…S5-S8). Therefore, our model may overestimate emissions in regions where mangrove deforestation rates are slowing because of policy changes Richards et al, 2020). We further assumed that future rates of loss due to each of the five drivers were proportional to their historical contributions.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Predictions To Input Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%