2019
DOI: 10.3390/rs11050515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying Lodging Percentage and Lodging Severity Using a UAV-Based Canopy Height Model Combined with an Objective Threshold Approach

Abstract: Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) open new opportunities in precision agriculture and phenotyping because of their flexibility and low cost. In this study, the potential of UAV imagery was evaluated to quantify lodging percentage and lodging severity of barley using structure from motion (SfM) techniques. Traditionally, lodging quantification is based on time-consuming manual field observations. Our UAV-based approach makes use of a quantitative threshold to determine lodging percentage in a first step. The deri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to identify the cut threshold between lodging and non-lodging plants, two methods were tested in this study, using both a fixed and variable parameter to establish the threshold. The fixed method followed the one proposed by Wilke et al (2019) for lodging evaluation, in which four lodging percentage thresholds related to the max height 99% percentile were calculated: 80%, 70%, 60%, and 50% of the plant height normalized reduction.…”
Section: Identification Of Maize Lodgingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to identify the cut threshold between lodging and non-lodging plants, two methods were tested in this study, using both a fixed and variable parameter to establish the threshold. The fixed method followed the one proposed by Wilke et al (2019) for lodging evaluation, in which four lodging percentage thresholds related to the max height 99% percentile were calculated: 80%, 70%, 60%, and 50% of the plant height normalized reduction.…”
Section: Identification Of Maize Lodgingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyze the proposed methods, 45 random validation polygons were distributed within the field (Figure 3a), each one with a sampling area of 12 m². In each sample area, lodging was manually quantified using the RGB orthomosaic (GSD = 0.023 cm) ( Figure 3a) and further compared with the lodging area determined by each method based on CSM (Figure 3a and 3b) using regression analysis, following the procedure proposed by Wilke et al (2019). Since lodging areas could be easily identified due to the high spatial resolution orthomosaic, we could precisely quantify the lodging percentage area within each sampled area, which allowed the validation process of the methods tested in this study.…”
Section: Validating Lodging Percentagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These challenges can be addressed with deep learning, but they need a large labelled database to feed the algorithm [41]. While UAV-derived DSM from commercial UAVs have been largely used for small scale terrain mapping and 3D modelling of urban areas [42][43][44], they have been also proved useful for agricultural applications [45][46][47][48][49][50].As such, this study explored four terrain analysis tools, based on point cloud data or DSM, for the delineation and quantification, in hectares, of damages in field crops due to insurable causes, such as weather events and wildlife attacks. For this study, we focused on events that cause severe physical damages in the plant structure, generating abrupt depressions in the surface of the canopy, from which the plant rarely recovers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These challenges can be addressed with deep learning, but they need a large labelled database to feed the algorithm [41]. While UAV-derived DSM from commercial UAVs have been largely used for small scale terrain mapping and 3D modelling of urban areas [42][43][44], they have been also proved useful for agricultural applications [45][46][47][48][49][50].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%