1993
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183x003300040005x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of Tannis in Birdsfoot Trefoil Germplasm

Abstract: Condensed tannins in birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.) have been detected, but not quantified extensively. The objective of this study was quantitative analysis of tannins in birdsfoot trefoil germplasm. Diverse accessions were evaluated at two locations and on three harvest dates, and their tissues were analyzed by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS), an accurate and efficient procedure increasingly used in quantitative germplasm evaluation. Ninety‐seven diverse accessions of L. corniculatus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
27
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, seedling year herbage CT concentration varied little from the June to August harvest dates at both locations ( Figure 1) . The following year, herbage samples were available from multiple harvests only at one location and the CT concentration was lowest at the May harvest date, highest at the July harvest date, and declined to an intermediate level at the August sampling date, consistent with the observations of Roberts et al (1993) . In this study, a location x population interaction was detected, but crossover interactions were not observed and the differences between locations for mean population CT concentration were small (0 .6, 3 .1, and 7.3 ± 1 .3 g CE kg-1 DM for the low-tannin, parental, and high-tannin populations, respectively) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, seedling year herbage CT concentration varied little from the June to August harvest dates at both locations ( Figure 1) . The following year, herbage samples were available from multiple harvests only at one location and the CT concentration was lowest at the May harvest date, highest at the July harvest date, and declined to an intermediate level at the August sampling date, consistent with the observations of Roberts et al (1993) . In this study, a location x population interaction was detected, but crossover interactions were not observed and the differences between locations for mean population CT concentration were small (0 .6, 3 .1, and 7.3 ± 1 .3 g CE kg-1 DM for the low-tannin, parental, and high-tannin populations, respectively) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In this study, maturity effects were minimized by uniformly harvesting herbage samples in the late bud to early flower stage . In another study, herbage CT concentration decreased from July to September in birdsfoot trefoil accessions grown at two locations (Roberts et al ., 1993) . In this study, seedling year herbage CT concentration varied little from the June to August harvest dates at both locations ( Figure 1) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The accumulated experimental evidence for and against the so-called plant defense theory [15][16][17][18] is equivocal 19,20 and its usefulness for the practical application in agronomy disputable 14 . Previous studies of seasonal fluctuations of tannin concentrations in forage plants yielded conflicting results 14,[21][22][23][24] and mechanisms driving seasonal and developmental dynamics of tannin concentrations under field conditions are not yet well understood. Based on an experiment with potted Onobrychis viciifolia and Lotus corniculatus, it has been suggested that fluctuations in condensed tannin concentrations in harvestable aboveground biomass are functions of biomass proportions between tannin-rich leaves and tannin-poor stems in pure stands, and of biomass proportions between tanniferous and non-tanniferous plant species in mixed stands 14 .…”
Section: Plant Sciences and Forage Cultivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the errors of conventional laboratory assays for these poorly de®ned compounds these levels of accuracy may well be the best achievable. However, there is no reason to suspect that other types of tannin analyses would not yield calibrations that are satisfactory for most ecological studies (Roberts et al 1993).…”
Section: Plant Secondary Metabolites and Anti-nutritional Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%