To delay evolution of insect resistance to transgenic crops producing Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins, nearby ''refuges'' of host plants not producing Bt toxins are required in many regions. Such refuges are expected to be most effective in slowing resistance when the toxin concentration in Bt crops is high enough to kill all or nearly all insects heterozygous for resistance. However, Bt corn, Zea mays, introduced recently does not meet this ''high-dose'' criterion for control of western corn rootworm (WCR), Diabrotica virgifera virgifera. A greenhouse method of rearing WCR on transgenic corn expressing the Cry3Bb1 protein was used in which approximately 25% of previously unexposed larvae survived relative to isoline survival (compared to 1-4% in the field). After three generations of full larval rearing on Bt corn (Constant-exposure colony), WCR larval survival was equivalent on Bt corn and isoline corn in greenhouse trials, and the LC50 was 22-fold greater for the Constant-exposure colony than for the Control colony in diet bioassays with Cry3Bb1 protein on artificial diet. After six generations of greenhouse selection, the ratio of larval recovery on Bt corn to isoline corn in the field was 11.7-fold greater for the Constant-exposure colony than the Control colony. Removal from selection for six generations did not decrease survival on Bt corn in the greenhouse. The results suggest that rapid response to selection is possible in the absence of mating with unexposed beetles, emphasizing the importance of effective refuges for resistance management.

Fig. 2.Transformants releasing E␤C suffered less damage than control lines when EPNs were present. (A) Root damage measured on plants that had received neither WCR eggs nor nematodes was minimal, and there was no difference between transformed and nontransformed plants (n ϭ 5, P ϭ 0.87). (B) Root damage on plants that received only WCR eggs, but no nematodes, was substantial. Again, no significant difference was found between the transformed and nontransformed plants (n ϭ 5, P ϭ 0.18). (C) In plots that received WCR eggs and H. megidis, roots from transformed plants (pooled) had significantly less damage than roots from control lines (n ϭ 30, P ϭ 0.007). Approximately one-quarter of the transformed plants were found not to emit E␤C. Removing these plants from the statistical analysis did not significantly affect the results. The letters above the bars indicate significant differences within a graph. Error bars indicate standard errors.

Amaranthus species, commonly referred to as “pigweeds,” are among the most troublesome weeds in many crop production systems. Effective control of these species often begins with an understanding of their biological and reproductive characteristics. At two sites in Missouri, six pigweed species (redroot pigweed, common waterhemp, spiny amaranth, tumble pigweed, smooth pigweed, and Palmer amaranth) were established in 60-m rows spaced 1.5 m apart. At biweekly intervals, plant heights and dry weights were recorded for each species; seed numbers were estimated at the end of the growing season. Dry weight of Palmer amaranth was up to 65% greater than those of all other species 2 wk after planting (WAP). Palmer amaranth biomass accumulation remained greater than those of the other species throughout the season and at the end of the season was 1.2- and 2.7-fold greater than those of redroot and tumble pigweed, respectively. Palmer amaranth was approximately 10 cm tall 2 WAP (37% taller than the next tallest species, redroot pigweed) and approximately 24 cm tall 4 WAP (45% taller than redroot pigweed). In contrast, common waterhemp had not emerged 2 WAP, and plant dry weight 4 WAP was approximately 11 and 26% those of Palmer amaranth and redroot pigweed, respectively. Final plant height ranged from 58 (tumble pigweed) to 208 cm (Palmer amaranth). Redroot pigweed, smooth pigweed, common waterhemp, and Palmer amaranth plants each produced over 250,000 seeds plant−1. Spiny amaranth and tumble pigweed produced approximately 114,000 and 50,000 seeds plant−1, respectively. Common waterhemp produced 535 seeds g−1 of total plant dry weight; this seed production was 1.4-, 1.4-, 2.0-, 3.4-, and 3.4-fold greater than those of redroot pigweed, smooth pigweed, Palmer amaranth, tumble pigweed, and spiny amaranth, respectively. Because the timing for many postemergence herbicides depends on weed height, rapid growth shortly after emergence reduces the time frame for optimum control of species such as Palmer amaranth. Delayed emergence also could result in escaped common waterhemp. Escape of only a few plants could result in a rapid increase in seed populations in the soil seed bank and may select for late-emerging biotypes.

Bisphenol A (BPA) is an endocrine disrupting environmental contaminant used in a wide variety of products, and BPA metabolites are found in almost everyone’s urine, suggesting widespread exposure from multiple sources. Regulatory agencies estimate that virtually all BPA exposure is from food and beverage packaging. However, free BPA is applied to the outer layer of thermal receipt paper present in very high (∼20 mg BPA/g paper) quantities as a print developer. Not taken into account when considering thermal paper as a source of BPA exposure is that some commonly used hand sanitizers, as well as other skin care products, contain mixtures of dermal penetration enhancing chemicals that can increase by up to 100 fold the dermal absorption of lipophilic compounds such as BPA. We found that when men and women held thermal receipt paper immediately after using a hand sanitizer with penetration enhancing chemicals, significant free BPA was transferred to their hands and then to French fries that were eaten, and the combination of dermal and oral BPA absorption led to a rapid and dramatic average maximum increase (Cmax) in unconjugated (bioactive) BPA of ∼7 ng/mL in serum and ∼20 µg total BPA/g creatinine in urine within 90 min. The default method used by regulatory agencies to test for hazards posed by chemicals is intra-gastric gavage. For BPA this approach results in less than 1% of the administered dose being bioavailable in blood. It also ignores dermal absorption as well as sublingual absorption in the mouth that both bypass first-pass liver metabolism. The elevated levels of BPA that we observed due to holding thermal paper after using a product containing dermal penetration enhancing chemicals have been related to an increased risk for a wide range of developmental abnormalities as well as diseases in adults.

Fecal pollution of water resources is an environmental problem of increasing importance. Identification of individual host sources of fecal Escherichia coli, such as humans, pets, production animals, and wild animals, is prerequisite to formulation of remediation plans. Ribotyping has been used to distinguish fecal E. coli of human origin from pooled fecal E. coli isolates of nonhuman origin. We have extended application of this technique to distinguishing fecal E. coli ribotype patterns from human and seven individual nonhuman hosts. Classification accuracy was best when the analysis was limited to three host sources. Application of this technique to identification of host sources of fecal coliforms in water could assist in formulation of pollution reduction plans.Fecal pollution of water resources is a problem of increasing worldwide concern (4, 15). Human population growth, inadequate sewage systems, and management of animal waste (especially related to concentrated animal feeding operations) are some of the issues associated with maintenance of supplies of clean water (17). Counts of commensal coliform bacteria have traditionally been used to indicate the potential presence of pathogenic microbes of intestinal origin (1). Total coliform and fecal coliform numbers (1) are useful for estimating fecal pollution levels but give no indication of the specific sources of microbial pollution, such as humans, production animals, pets, or migratory birds. Examples of methods which have been used as indicators of host sources include phage susceptibility (20) and the ratio of fecal coliforms to streptococci (5). Such indirect measurements are based on unstable parameters and may thereby lead to erroneous conclusions (11). More recently, DNA fingerprinting techniques such as ribotyping (11), pulsedfield gel electrophoresis (9), PCR of repetitive intergenic sequences (3), and 16S ribosomal DNA length heterogeneity PCR with terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (2) have been described as promising for discriminating between fecal-origin bacteria from humans and animals. Multiple antibiotic resistance phenotype has been used to distinguish between human and nonhuman sources of Escherichia coli (7,10,11,19) and streptococci (6, 18), but genetic instability or changes in antibiotic use can alter the resistance profiles obtained.Ribotyping has been compared to multiple antibiotic resistance profiles, and both approaches were reportedly complementary in discriminating between human and nonhuman (collective) sources of fecal pollution (11). Ribotyping has since become a popular approach (personal communications) to the problem of differentiating between fecal E. coli pollution from humans and, in particular, that from animals and birds. We describe here the use of ribotyping for the identification of E. coli cultured from feces of humans, cattle, swine, horses, chickens, turkeys, dogs, and migratory geese. MATERIALS AND METHODSFecal E. coli. Table 1 presents the host sources of feces, the numbers of individuals samp...