2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(00)00134-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of constraint on elastic–plastic 3D crack front by the J–A2 three-term solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
39
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
39
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed by Nikishkov et al [18] and Chao and Zhu [19], the J-A 2 three-term solution [13][14][15] is considered as the most effective and theoretically sound asymptotic solution. As a result, the three-term solution has been extensively applied to the following areas: 1) fracture toughness evaluation (Chao and Ji, [20], and Chao and Lam [21]); 2) specimen size requirements in two-parameter fracture testing (Chao and Zhu [19]); 3) non-hardening materials (Zhu and Chao [22]); 4) creeping materials (Chao et al, [23]); 5) three dimensional cracks (Kim et al [24]); and 6) ductile crack growth (Chao and Zhu [16], and Chao et al [17]). Other approaches to quantify the crack tip constraint include the J-T technique proposed by Betegon and Hancock [25], and the J-Q theory by O'Dowd and Shih [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed by Nikishkov et al [18] and Chao and Zhu [19], the J-A 2 three-term solution [13][14][15] is considered as the most effective and theoretically sound asymptotic solution. As a result, the three-term solution has been extensively applied to the following areas: 1) fracture toughness evaluation (Chao and Ji, [20], and Chao and Lam [21]); 2) specimen size requirements in two-parameter fracture testing (Chao and Zhu [19]); 3) non-hardening materials (Zhu and Chao [22]); 4) creeping materials (Chao et al, [23]); 5) three dimensional cracks (Kim et al [24]); and 6) ductile crack growth (Chao and Zhu [16], and Chao et al [17]). Other approaches to quantify the crack tip constraint include the J-T technique proposed by Betegon and Hancock [25], and the J-Q theory by O'Dowd and Shih [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This parameter is not frequently used to analyze problems related to fracture mechanics. It was described in [20,21], where the authors tried to determine the difference between the distribution of stresses calculated numerically using a finite element method and those calculated according to the HRR solution recommended for the predominantly plane strain conditions. The author of this paper suggests that the use of the parameter Q pso is a good approach because it shows the difference between the actual distribution of stresses responsible for the crack opening and the distribution determined according to a theoretical solution for a case of the dominance of plane strain.…”
Section: Mgrabamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A year later, Rice and Tracey [18] employed the ratio of the average stresses  m to the effective stresses  eff , calculated according to the Huber-Misses-Hencky (HMH) hypothesis,  m / eff . Some researchers have considered the influence of geometric constraints on the distribution of stresses for three-dimensional cases, analyzing the actual stresses responsible for the crack opening [19], or the differences between the actual description obtained through the FEM analysis and that obtained on the basis of the HRR solution for a case of plane strain [20,21]. It is difficult to discuss all the parameters in one article.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ejemplos tí-picos de este estado son una grieta que atraviesa de lado a lado una placa -donde el espesor de la placa es del mismo orden de magnitud que la longitud característica de la grieta-o grietas situadas en las esquinas. En estas situaciones, la triaxialidad que aparece en los campos de tensiones en los puntos cercanos al frente de grieta, tiene gran influencia sobre los resultados obtenidos en los estudios de mecánica de la fractura [33,[55][56][57][58][59][60].…”
Section: Situaciones Triaxiales Estudio Del Efecto De La Constricciónunclassified
“…1-6, 8, 10, 14, 37, 38, 45, 46, 51, 57, 58, 64, 67, 119, 139 xfem Método de los elementos finitos extendidos, del inglés Extended Finite Element Method . [2][3][4]14,39,40,[44][45][46][47][48]50,52,53,58,62,67,68,70,72,73,79,88,93,118,120,127,[130][131][132][133]135,[140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147] 7,9,11,14,18,23,31,57,58,[60][61]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%