2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2006000600017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantificação de raízes metabolicamente ativas de cana-de-açúcar

Abstract: Resumo -O objetivo deste trabalho foi desenvolver um método para determinar a distribuição e o desenvolvimento de raízes metabolicamente ativas de cana-de-açúcar no solo, por meio da técnica da diluição do isótopo 15 N. O delineamento experimental foi em blocos subdivididos no tempo. A uréia foi o meio de fornecimento do traçador 15 N, a partir de solução aplicada às folhas das plantas. Depois da colheita da parte aérea, foram abertas trincheiras, e as amostras de solo + raízes foram colhidas por meio de monól… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
13

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…the values of rld, dMd and root area in the 0-0.10 m layer (1.29 cm cm -3 , 0.68 mg cm -3 and 5.10 mm 2 cm -3 , respectively) were 77; 89 and 72 % times higher than the values for the same characteristics in the 10-40 cm layer, indicating a high root concentration in the surface layer. Faroni & trivelin (2006);costa et al, 2007;and luca et al (2008), and correlate well with the physical characteristics (table 2), ie. the values of rld and dMd are lowest at depths where soil bulk density and penetration resistance are highest, and the rld and dMd values highest at depths where macroporosity is highest.…”
Section: Macroporosity (Ma) and Microporosity (Mi)mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…the values of rld, dMd and root area in the 0-0.10 m layer (1.29 cm cm -3 , 0.68 mg cm -3 and 5.10 mm 2 cm -3 , respectively) were 77; 89 and 72 % times higher than the values for the same characteristics in the 10-40 cm layer, indicating a high root concentration in the surface layer. Faroni & trivelin (2006);costa et al, 2007;and luca et al (2008), and correlate well with the physical characteristics (table 2), ie. the values of rld and dMd are lowest at depths where soil bulk density and penetration resistance are highest, and the rld and dMd values highest at depths where macroporosity is highest.…”
Section: Macroporosity (Ma) and Microporosity (Mi)mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…O sistema radicular foi avaliado pelo método do monólito (Vasconcelos et al, 2003;Faroni & Trivelin, 2006). Os monólitos, com dimensão de 0,25x0,10x0,10 m para a largura, altura e comprimento, respectivamente, foram coletados em junho de 2010, logo após a colheita, em quatro trincheiras (blocos), nos diferentes sistemas de manejo.…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…As raízes foram separadas do solo por lavagem em água corrente, com uso de peneira de 2,0 mm (Vasconcelos et al, 2003;Faroni & Trivelin, 2006), e suas imagens foram digitalizadas em scanner de leitura ótica, com resolução de 400 dpi, para a análise da densidade radicular com o programa Siarcs (Jorge & Crestana, 1996). Os dados médios de cada sistema de manejo foram interpolados, o que permitiu a espacialização da densidade radicular na região entre duas soqueiras.…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…The control treatments (without N) and 120 kg ha -1 of urea-N, with four replications each, were selected for the study of metabolically active roots, according to the method described by Faroni (2004) and Faroni & Trivelin (2006). The locations chosen for application of the urea solution enriched with 15 N and for sampling of the root system were the same as of the trenches opened for the comparative study of the root sampling methods, as previously described.…”
Section: Metabolically Active Rootsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of isotopic dilution with 15 N allows the evaluation of the root mass with active metabolism and its distribution in the soil (Faroni & Trivelin, 2006). The objective of this study was to compare two methods of root system evaluation (probe and monolith), as well as the root system distribution and metabolically active roots of sugar cane in terms of N rates applied in the furrow at planting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%