2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2011.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of life in children and adolescents surviving cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
1
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(87 reference statements)
1
36
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Survivors of childhood cancer of the studied population showed better QoL than the survivors of adolescence cancer. Several scientific studies suggest that cancer survivors in childhood demonstrate a satisfying QoL and a positive perception of their state of health in relation to adolescent patients and their peers who are healthy (Bradley Eilertsen et al., ; Koopman et al., ; Langeveld et al., ; Ribi et al., ; Shankar et al., ). On the contrary, there are other studies whose results differ from the previous ones, where survivors appear to have an unsatisfactory QoL (Koopman et al., ; Langeveld et al., ; Ribi et al., ; Shankar et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Survivors of childhood cancer of the studied population showed better QoL than the survivors of adolescence cancer. Several scientific studies suggest that cancer survivors in childhood demonstrate a satisfying QoL and a positive perception of their state of health in relation to adolescent patients and their peers who are healthy (Bradley Eilertsen et al., ; Koopman et al., ; Langeveld et al., ; Ribi et al., ; Shankar et al., ). On the contrary, there are other studies whose results differ from the previous ones, where survivors appear to have an unsatisfactory QoL (Koopman et al., ; Langeveld et al., ; Ribi et al., ; Shankar et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible limitation of the study is that we used the KINDL-R with adolescents older than the 16 years, for which it was originally validated. The instrument has, however, been used for older adolescents in two earlier Norwegian studies for up to 17 year [7] and up to 20 year olds [43], yielding meaningful results unbiased by age, thereby supporting validity for youths older than 16 years. Convergent validity for the KINDL-R with another QoL instrument designed for adolescents up to 18 years, the Inventory of Life Quality in Children and Adolescents, was also satisfactory [10].…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kinder Lebensqualität Fragebogen (KINDL-R; questionnaire for measuring health-related quality of life in children and adolescents, revised version) [39] is a wellestablished instrument used to measure QoL for children aged 8-16 years in numerous clinical and epidemiological studies, including several in Norway [7,9,[40][41][42][43][44]. It consists of 24 items constituting six subscales, each measured with four items: Physical Well-being, Emotional Well-being, Self-esteem, and Family, Friends, and School.…”
Section: Quality Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are well documented associations between the contributions of specific sociodemographic factors, cancer diagnoses, presence of chronic disease, and poor quality of life in physical domains among survivors of childhood cancer [23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29], knowledge of how the specific frailty phenotype impacts quality of life among young adult survivors of childhood cancer has not been documented. Nevertheless, there is evidence that physical function/fitness, both perceived and measured with objective performance testing, is associated with participation and quality of life in this population.…”
Section: Associations Between Fitness and Quality Of Life In Childhoomentioning
confidence: 99%