Proceedings of the June 1970 Design Automation Workshop on Design Automation - DAC '70 1970
DOI: 10.1145/800160.805114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of designs from an automatic logic generator (ALERT)

Abstract: Automation of the design of computer logic has evoked wlde-spread interest and activity. Nevertheless, detailed comparisons of automatically generated logic and manually prepared logic have not been made available.The ALERT program is a logic generator which accepts as input a summary description of a new computer in a high-level language, and from this it compiles logic designs to carry out the functions specified. This paper examines the quality of logic generated by the ALERT system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the ALERT system was validated on an existing design, the IBM 1800, and the implementation produced required 160% more circuits than the manual design [Fri70].…”
Section: Logic Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the ALERT system was validated on an existing design, the IBM 1800, and the implementation produced required 160% more circuits than the manual design [Fri70].…”
Section: Logic Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results were usually more expensive than manual implementations and did not take advantage of the target technology. For example, the ALERT system was validated on an existing design, the IBM 1800, and the implementation produced required 160% more circuits than the manual design [Fri70].…”
Section: Logic Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results were usually more expensive than manual implementations and did not take advantage of the target technology. For example, the ALERT system was validated on an existing design, the IBM 1800, and the implementation produced required 160% more circuits than the manual design [Fri70].In attempts to generate more efficient logic and to give the user more control over the implementation, other strategies were tried [Sch62, Mes68, Hi173]. These constrain the specification language so that there is nearly a one-to-one correspondence between the specification and the implementation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results were usually more expen-sive than manual implementations and did not take advantage of the target technology. For example, the ALERT system was validated on an existing design, the IBM 1800, and the implementation produced required 160% more gates than the manual design [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%