2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2008.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality control of global solar radiation using sunshine duration hours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
46
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the CERES-EBAF had a bias of 7.31 W/m 2 at the CMA sites, whereas the biases of the six reanalysis R s products ranged from 23.15 W/m 2 to 71.95 W/m 2 . Previous studies have pointed out that the reliability of data obtained in China has often been dubious because of the technical failures and operating problems [54,55]. However, this study found that the bias and RMSE of the CERES-EBAF R s product were 11.36 W/m 2 and 19.38 W/m 2 , respectively, in DJF using the quality-controlled CMA surface observations as the validation data, whereas these values were 1.30 W/m 2 and 18.04 W/m 2 in JJA.…”
Section: Comparison With Ceres-ebafmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the CERES-EBAF had a bias of 7.31 W/m 2 at the CMA sites, whereas the biases of the six reanalysis R s products ranged from 23.15 W/m 2 to 71.95 W/m 2 . Previous studies have pointed out that the reliability of data obtained in China has often been dubious because of the technical failures and operating problems [54,55]. However, this study found that the bias and RMSE of the CERES-EBAF R s product were 11.36 W/m 2 and 19.38 W/m 2 , respectively, in DJF using the quality-controlled CMA surface observations as the validation data, whereas these values were 1.30 W/m 2 and 18.04 W/m 2 in JJA.…”
Section: Comparison With Ceres-ebafmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daily and Monthly meteorological data at 122 CMA routine weather stations released by the CMA Meteorological Information Center were used in this study. The CMA surface observations were dubious due to technical failures and operating problems (e.g., instrument replacement) [54,55]. The quality of the CMA surface observations used in this study was controlled based on the surface reconstructed data using routine meteorological data including air temperature, air pressure, relative humidity, sunshine duration, and precipitation [4,56].…”
Section: Ground Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, one of the major concerns of operational radiometric networks is to perform a rigorous quality control (QC) on the measurements (e.g. Journée and Bertrand, 2011;Moradi, 2009;Roesch et al, 2011). This is an indispensable step before further processing of the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A medida da radiação solar foi, durante muito tempo, difícil e onerosa, em razão dos custos elevados limitarem as aquisições de radiômetros, restringindo seu uso aos centros de pesquisa (Blanco & Sentelhas, 2002;Tiba et al 2005;Turco & Rizatti, 2006;Rensheng et al, 2006;Robaa, 2008;Moradi, 2009;Carvalho et al 2011); assim, muitos modelos estatísticos e/ou paramétricos de estimativa foram desenvolvidos com base em parâmetros meteorológicos, geográficos, atmosféricos e astronômicos. Neste contexto, Angströn (1924) propôs um modelo estatístico linear, que foi simplificado por Prescott (1940), em função das dificuldades de medidas em dias com ausência total de nuvens e que correlaciona a transmissividade atmosférica da radiação solar global (K T d ) (razão entre a radiação global e a radiação no topo da atmosfera) e a razão de insolação (n/N) (razão entre o brilho solar e o fotoperíodo).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified