2016
DOI: 10.3390/rs8030225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Reanalysis Surface Incident Shortwave Radiation Products from NCEP, ECMWF, GSFC, and JMA Using Satellite and Surface Observations

Abstract: Solar radiation incident at the Earth's surface (R s ) is an essential component of the total energy exchange between the atmosphere and the surface. Reanalysis data have been widely used, but a comprehensive validation using surface measurements is still highly needed. In this study, we evaluated the R s estimates from six current representative global reanalyses (NCEP-NCAR, NCEP-DOE; CFSR; ERA-Interim; MERRA; and JRA-55) using surface measurements from different observation networks [GEBA; BSRN; GC-NET; Buoy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
113
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(109 reference statements)
16
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current reanalysis systems calculate cloud properties based on the assimilation of water vapor and temperature profiles from radiosonde and satellite observations. However, spatial biases in these data have been found, by comparing R s data derived from reanalysis datasets with field observations and satellite data in numerous validation studies [10,[34][35][36]. Wang et al [10] find that the R s data derived from the Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) reanalysis data and ERA-interim (ERAI) products have a large spatial bias of 29.8 W·m −2 and 19.1 W·m −2 in China, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current reanalysis systems calculate cloud properties based on the assimilation of water vapor and temperature profiles from radiosonde and satellite observations. However, spatial biases in these data have been found, by comparing R s data derived from reanalysis datasets with field observations and satellite data in numerous validation studies [10,[34][35][36]. Wang et al [10] find that the R s data derived from the Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) reanalysis data and ERA-interim (ERAI) products have a large spatial bias of 29.8 W·m −2 and 19.1 W·m −2 in China, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earliest assessment of reanalysis fluxes using GEBA data is documented in Wild et al (1998a), while the most upto-date assessment of six recent reanalyses was performed by Zhang et al (2016). Similarly to climate models, reanalyses were shown to have difficulties in representing the multidecadal variations in surface shortwave radiation seen in the GEBA data (Wild and Schmucki, 2011).…”
Section: Validation Of Surface Energy Fluxes From Climate Models Reamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data were obtained from the NASA Langley Research Center CERES ordering tool (http://ceres.larc.nasa.gov/). CERES-EBAF has shown greater accuracy compared to other gridded radiation products as it incorporates detailed cloud and aerosol information (Ma et al 2015;Wild et al 2013Zhang et al 2015Zhang et al , 2016. Figure 8 also depicts additional ground-based measurements from independent sites (black dots; Abisko, Sweden; Atqasuk, Alaska; Sondankyla, Finland; and Summit, Greenland) and others that are part of the World Climate Research Programme Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN; Hegner et al 1998;Ohmura et al 1998).…”
Section: Nares Strait Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%