Quality assurance and benchmarking: an approach for European dental schools

Abstract

: This document was written by Task Force 3 of DentEd III, which is a European Union funded Thematic Network working under the auspices of the Association for Dental Education in Europe (ADEE). It provides a guide to assist in the harmonisation of Dental Education Quality Assurance (QA) systems across the European Higher Education Area (EHEA). There is reference to the work, thus far, of DentEd, DentEd Evolves, DentEd III and the ADEE as they strive to assist the convergence of standards in dental education; obviously QA and benchmarking has an important part to play in the European HE response to the Bologna Process. Definitions of Quality, Quality Assurance, Quality Management and Quality Improvement are given and put into the context of dental education. The possible process and framework for Quality Assurance are outlined and some basic guidelines/recommendations suggested. It is recognised that Quality Assurance in Dental Schools has to co‐exist as part of established Quality Assurance systems within faculties and universities, and that Schools also may have to comply with existing local or national systems. Perhaps of greatest importance are the 14 ‘requirements’ for the Quality Assurance of Dental Education in Europe. These, together with the document and its appendices, were unanimously supported by the ADEE at its General Assembly in 2006. As there must be more than one road to achieve a convergence or harmonisation standard, a number of appendices are made available on the ADEE website. These provide a series of ‘toolkits’ from which schools can ‘pick and choose’ to assist them in developing QA systems appropriate to their own environment. Validated contributions and examples continue to be most welcome from all members of the European dental community for inclusion at this website. It is realised that not all schools will be able to achieve all of these requirements immediately, by definition, successful harmonisation is a process that will take time. At the end of the DentEd III project, ADEE will continue to support the progress of all schools in Europe towards these aims.

A review of continuing professional development for dentists in Europe*

“…That review of undergraduate education has been undertaken by the DentEd programme (99)(100)(101). Following that, the DentCPD project has focused on CPD and this review is part of that project.…”

International standards for programmes of training in intensive care medicine in Europe

“…The programme standards presented here are a necessary, but not a sufficient, foundation for improving education and training in ICM. They must be combined with a dynamic quality assurance process delivered locally and managed by national training organisations [27,28]. Regulatory authorities must recognise that quality assurance processes place significant demands on trainers, programme directors and professional organisations [29].…”

Using criteria-based interview models for assessing clinical expertise to select physiotherapists at major multisport games

“…Similarly, benchmarking is an established means of identifying competence and levels of specialist practice in many professions, particularly when linked to the higher education sector 6. Much of the clinical reasoning literature also describes expert behaviour as having an awareness of scope through reflection and an ability to modify strategies depending on the individual circumstances 7–9.…”