2018 International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Computers (CONIELECOMP) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/conielecomp.2018.8327191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quadratic buck-boost converter with positive output-voltage and continuous input-current

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
79
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the conventional interleave based boost or buck-boost converters are chosen for multi-level boost converters, it introduces a heavy spike in inductor current and the output voltage. The same can be observed from the experimental waveforms of the literature reported in Rosas-Caro et al (2018a) and Hegazy et al (2012).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the conventional interleave based boost or buck-boost converters are chosen for multi-level boost converters, it introduces a heavy spike in inductor current and the output voltage. The same can be observed from the experimental waveforms of the literature reported in Rosas-Caro et al (2018a) and Hegazy et al (2012).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The authors in Divakar et al (2008) reported soft switching techniques such as zero voltage switching and zero-current switching to decrease the switching losses in the traditional boost converter. The authors in Hegazy et al (2012) and Rosas-Caro et al (2018a) reported the converters with the interleaved structure to achieve the required output voltage with the continuous input current. However, the interleaved structure is complicated when compared to the conventional boost converter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the use of a Luo converter in the second stage of the cascaded boost converter, instead of a second boost converter, increased the voltage gain, and a higher voltage gain ratio became possible with a lower value of the duty cycle. Additionally, its voltage gain became higher than the converters of [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In comparison with the converters of [10,12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In Figure 6, the non-ideal voltage gain of the suggested converters of [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] and the proposed converter are compared with each other. While the duty cycle varied from 0 to 68 percent, the voltage gain of the proposed converter had a greater value in comparison with the mentioned converters of [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. While the duty cycle varied from 0 to 60 percent, the voltage gain of the proposed converter was 1.5-times more than the mentioned converter of [9].…”
Section: Non-ideal Voltage Gain Comparison Of the Proposed Topology With The Recently Proposed Convertersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation