2010
DOI: 10.1080/13645570903368286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Q methodology in social work research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants in Q methodological studies are exposed to a set of cards containing subjective statements or visual images which they can relate to subjectively. The approach is considered to be a sensitive way of gathering data from children on themes that may be difficult to express [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants in Q methodological studies are exposed to a set of cards containing subjective statements or visual images which they can relate to subjectively. The approach is considered to be a sensitive way of gathering data from children on themes that may be difficult to express [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim was to establish whether practice educators considered some aspects of competence and capability to be more important than others. Examples of the cards include: The event was similar to a focus group and the participants' discussions were captured on a voice recorder and were a useful 'spur for deeper and richer analysis' (Bloor, 1997:49;Ellingsen et al, 2010). This secondary method of engagement with research participants proved to be an important opportunity to review and check the developing understandings about practice educators' perspectives about competence and capability for social work practice.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were collected together, similar statements compressed, paraphrased and where appropriate reworded (Ellingsen, Størksen, & Stephens, 2010) to produce 36 statements. A card sort activity took place with practice educators where they were asked to rank the statement cards 'into a continuum of significance' (Jahrami, Marnoch, & Gray, 2009:178).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 technique (Winter, 2013), and the Q-sort (Ellingsen et al 2010;Serfass & Sherman, 2013). Sixsmith (1986) noted how the MST could also be used within a phenomenological framework to study individual accounts and personal meanings.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%