Q as Hypothesis: A Study in Methodology

Abstract

Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details.

FH Luke’s ‘Unpicking’: Some Observations on Francis Watson’s Recent Analysis (2018) and the Extent of the Phenomenon

“…The significance of these three instances on Watson’s list resides in the fact that, collectively, they suggest an alternative to the visual source-utilization model proposed by Watson (2009: 406; 2013: 170; 2018: 144-45; cf. Poirier 2012), whose FH Luke relies on a physical notebook to excerpt and subsequently redeploy Matthean materials.…”

“…9.51–19.27/28). 30 It should be noted that Watson’s utilization model is visual: FH Luke creates a notebook consisting of the excised Matthean material, which he subsequently utilizes in composing the TN (Watson 2009: 406; 2013: 170; 2018: 144-45; cf. Tuckett 2018: 131).…”

“… 2. Since 2000, notable publications dedicated to demonstrating and developing the FH include: Goodacre 2002, 2017, 2018; Goodacre and Perrin 2004; Watson 2009, 2013, 2018; Poirier 2012; Poirier and Peterson 2015 (with the exception of Kloppenborg’s essay); Barker 2016; Müller and Nielsen 2016 (the majority of enclosed essays); Kahl 2018; Eve 2021. …”