Proceedings 2003. Design Automation Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37451)
DOI: 10.1109/dac.2003.1219126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pushing ASIC performance in a power envelope

Abstract: Power dissipation is becoming the most challenging design constraint in nanometer technologies. Among various design implementation schemes, standard cell ASICs offer the best power efficiency for high-performance applications. The flexibility of ASICs allow for the use of multiple voltages and multiple thresholds to match the performance of critical regions to their timing constraints, and minimize the power everywhere else. We explore the trade-off between multiple supply voltages and multiple threshold volt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The design proposed in [8] performs only up shift and the static power consumed is 6.4 nW with delay of 22ns using 90nm technology. The design proposed in [2] also performs only up shift and static power consumed is 6.6nW with delay of 18.4ns using 130nm technology. The design proposed in [5] also performs only up shift and the average power consumed is 90nW with delay of 10ns using 130nm technology.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis With Other Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The design proposed in [8] performs only up shift and the static power consumed is 6.4 nW with delay of 22ns using 90nm technology. The design proposed in [2] also performs only up shift and static power consumed is 6.6nW with delay of 18.4ns using 130nm technology. The design proposed in [5] also performs only up shift and the average power consumed is 90nW with delay of 10ns using 130nm technology.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis With Other Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design proposed in [5] also performs only up shift and the average power consumed is 90nW with delay of 10ns using 130nm technology. The operating frequency used in designs [8], [2], and [3] is 1MHz. The design proposed in [5] also performs only up shift and the average power consumed is 58nW with delay of 1000ns using 350nm technology with operating frequency of 10 KHz.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis With Other Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, due to increasing variability in sub-90nm process, the variability in power dissipation has been a source of dropping yield, i.e., a significant portion of the yield is now power-limited in high-performance designs [5]. In order to continue the CMOS scaling, it is crucial to tame this exponential increase in power dissipation [2]. In this paper, we outline practical techniques that are used to reduce both leakage as well as active power in a standard-cell library based high-performance design flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several power reduction techniques can be adopted for modern power management designs, such as dynamic voltage scaling (DVS) [2], clock gating [3], power gating [1,4], body bias [5][6][7], and voltage islands [8]. DVS and clock gating can effectively reduce dynamic power consumption, while power gating and reverse body bias reduce static leakage power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%