2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.100.149902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Publisher’s Note:QECValues of the SuperallowedβEmittersMn50and

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
60
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our value deviates by 1.5 standard deviations from the result M E = −79384(28) keV of an ESR Schottky measurement [82], which is not used in the adjustment procedure of the Atomic Mass Evaluation due to its higher uncertainty. 89 Mo: The value from JYFLTRAP agrees with the AME2003 value, which is determined via a reaction Q-value measurement 92 Mo( 3 He, 6 He) 89 Mo from a study at MSU [83] and the mass of the primary nuclide 92 Mo.…”
Section: Mosupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, our value deviates by 1.5 standard deviations from the result M E = −79384(28) keV of an ESR Schottky measurement [82], which is not used in the adjustment procedure of the Atomic Mass Evaluation due to its higher uncertainty. 89 Mo: The value from JYFLTRAP agrees with the AME2003 value, which is determined via a reaction Q-value measurement 92 Mo( 3 He, 6 He) 89 Mo from a study at MSU [83] and the mass of the primary nuclide 92 Mo.…”
Section: Mosupporting
confidence: 59%
“…However, considering the prevalent discrepancies among the available literature this nuclide should be addressed in a future measurement. (6,7,8) were observed in coincidence with γ rays. The β-decay endpoint energies were measured by β-γ coincidence gated on the 741-keV γ ray and the derived Q EC values of 88 Tc were given in two different papers [70,71].…”
Section: Momentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Within a year, a second Penning-trap measurement [61] had confirmed the new 46 V result and had also found that the 42 Sc Q EC value differed from the Vonach result by six times the latter's quoted uncertainty. Two years later, another Penning-trap measurement [62] indicated that the 50 Mn and 54 Co Q EC values also differed from Vonach's results by a similar amount. These most-recent Penning-trap results quoted 0.1-keV uncertainties.…”
Section: A Evaluation Principlesmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Of course, this conclusion could [162] have been removed from the averages. The open squares are the results of Penning-trap measurements [61,62,73,149]; the filled squares are from combined (p, γ ) and (n, γ ) measurements (see Ref. [55] and the references listed in Footnotes f, g, and h of Table I); the filled triangles are from (p,n) threshold measurements [26,27,31,45,87,106,160,166]; and the filled diamond is the new ( 3 He,t) measurement for 46 V [63].…”
Section: A Evaluation Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The necessary relative uncertainty of the mass measurement depends on the physics being investigated and ranges from δm/m ≈ 10 −7 − 10 −8 in the field of nuclear physics [4,5,6] and astrophysics [7,8,9,10], down to the smallest possible uncertainties of better than 10 −11 for tests of fundamental interactions and their symmetries [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Penning traps are nowadays the most suitable devices for high-precision mass measurements of nuclides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%