Publications in Dance Medicine and Science: A Bibliographer’s Perspective

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to provide a statistical review of trends in dance medicine and science research over the last 38 years with regard to how much is being published, where it is being published, and what subject matter is attracting the most attention. All data were compiled through computer tabulations of entries in the authors’ Dance Medicine & Science Bibliography, 3rd Edition. When viewed in three-year intervals, the number of publications was seen to increase dramatically between 1977 and 1988, and decrease steadily at each interval through 2003. Over the time span in question, 141 authored books, 36 edited books, and 321 chapters have appeared, along with 405 articles in periodicals (led by Medical Problems of Performing Artists and the Journal of Dance Medicine & Science, with 151 and 136 articles, respectively). Eleven research subjects can be identified which have produced at least 100 references; the 3 most prolific subjects are Psychology/Personality/Perception/Memory/Stress, psychological (308); Technique/Teaching/Training (284); and Stress fracture/Overuse injury (241). Publications over the last 38 years in dance medicine and science portray it as a vigorous and diverse field, although there is potential cause for concern in the (at this time unexplained) decrease in number of publications since 1989.

Musculoskeletal Injuries and Pain in Dancers a Systematic Review Update

“…1 Solomon and Solomon, compilers of the Dance Medicine and Science Bibliography, have noted and raised concern regarding a steady decrease in the number of publications in dance medicine and science from 1989 through 2003, following a surge in such publications between 1977 and 1988. 20 However, the current study suggests that although quantity may be decreasing, quality is increasing, which should yield more robust results for the dance community. Those studies that were not deemed scientifically admissible for this review were excluded for reasons similar to those excluded in the previous review.…”

Measurement of Turnout in Dance Research: A Critical Review

“…TO is assessed by approximately 95% of practitioners during initial screens and injury evaluations, and it is one of the most frequently researched subjects in dance medicine and science. 56,57 However, some researchers have concluded that "the 'ultimate truth' concerning turnout and ballet remains elusive." 37 Much of this can be attributed to the absence of a standardized measurement, not only for TTO (a measurement inclusive of all components) but also for the components of TO.…”