2002
DOI: 10.1525/si.2002.25.3.271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public and Private Priorities in Managing Time in Genetic Research: The Icelandic deCode Case

Abstract: This article addresses the perplexing instance of Iceland effectively extending a franchise in 1998-scienti cally and scally-to deCode Genetics to archive the population's medical records, combine them with extensive genealogical records and ongoing genetic research, and use the information for research and commercial yield that is essentially the private provenance of deCode Genetics. After an overview of the special historical context of Iceland, which is paradoxically a principal value of the deCode enterpr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, as shown in many studies (Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff 1997; Häyrinen‐Alestalo, Snell, and Peltola 2000; Slaughter and Leslie 1997), science and technology policy debates on the subject of global competitiveness have reached academia in many countries, resulting in closer interaction among universities, governments, and industries. In this context, small Nordic countries such as Iceland (Ólafsson 1998; Wieting 2002) and Finland (Häyrinen‐Alestalo, Snell, and Peltola 2000; Kaukonen and Nieminen 1999; Miettinen 2002) have become all the more enterprising in their efforts to secure their economic competitiveness in the global marketplace, for instance, by channeling funding into potentially lucrative research areas, including biotechnology and molecular biology. During the mid‐1980s, Finnish biotechnological research suffered from several disadvantages, such as undersized research groups, insufficient project funding, defective instrumentalities, and a lack of specialists (Academy of Finland 1987).…”
Section: The University Department As a Complex Ecology Of Disciplinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, as shown in many studies (Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff 1997; Häyrinen‐Alestalo, Snell, and Peltola 2000; Slaughter and Leslie 1997), science and technology policy debates on the subject of global competitiveness have reached academia in many countries, resulting in closer interaction among universities, governments, and industries. In this context, small Nordic countries such as Iceland (Ólafsson 1998; Wieting 2002) and Finland (Häyrinen‐Alestalo, Snell, and Peltola 2000; Kaukonen and Nieminen 1999; Miettinen 2002) have become all the more enterprising in their efforts to secure their economic competitiveness in the global marketplace, for instance, by channeling funding into potentially lucrative research areas, including biotechnology and molecular biology. During the mid‐1980s, Finnish biotechnological research suffered from several disadvantages, such as undersized research groups, insufficient project funding, defective instrumentalities, and a lack of specialists (Academy of Finland 1987).…”
Section: The University Department As a Complex Ecology Of Disciplinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, having control over the meanings and truths of the past is a powerful position, for it defines in part how we think of the present (Wieting, 2002). Due to the power associated with it, controlling how populations think of the past is a point of continual struggle, and multiple pasts are generated within each generation.…”
Section: Pragmatism and Symbolic Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%