2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1042993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric validation of teacher empathy scale: Measurement invariance in gender

Abstract: Result from Wang et al. study described the development and validation of an empathy scale for teachers (EST) and suggested that the EST could be an effective tool to assess the empathy of primary, middle and high school teachers in relation to their students. This study examines the factorial structure and factorial invariance of the EST in an Iranian sample. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to explore dimensionality and test for measurement invariance in factor structure, factor loadings and interc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees with the recommendations to evaluate the operationalization of the construct in a specific cultural, social, and professional framework [ 56 , 72 , 73 ], particularly one where prosociality becomes a relevant job skill [ 72 , 73 ] and—in the specific case of the context studied—authenticated by regulatory requirements [ 51 , 52 ]. Although possibly comparable in different degrees and forms of operationalization, the actions of helping [ 36 , 37 ], sharing [ 38 ], caring [ 39 , 40 , 41 ], and feeling empathy [ 32 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ] constitute expressions of prosociality in various teaching scenarios, and it is displayed on multiple levels [ 1 ]. One is the micro-intrapersonal, which refers to dispositions and tendencies; another is the meso-intrapersonal, concerning behaviors directed to a person or small groups [ 1 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This agrees with the recommendations to evaluate the operationalization of the construct in a specific cultural, social, and professional framework [ 56 , 72 , 73 ], particularly one where prosociality becomes a relevant job skill [ 72 , 73 ] and—in the specific case of the context studied—authenticated by regulatory requirements [ 51 , 52 ]. Although possibly comparable in different degrees and forms of operationalization, the actions of helping [ 36 , 37 ], sharing [ 38 ], caring [ 39 , 40 , 41 ], and feeling empathy [ 32 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ] constitute expressions of prosociality in various teaching scenarios, and it is displayed on multiple levels [ 1 ]. One is the micro-intrapersonal, which refers to dispositions and tendencies; another is the meso-intrapersonal, concerning behaviors directed to a person or small groups [ 1 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, empathy is a predictor of prosociality [ 7 ]. Teacher empathy has been defined as a teacher’s ability to include and share the emotional states of their students [ 43 ], and its relevance as an attribute has been demonstrated [ 44 ]. Greater empathy is related to a better preparation to address bullying [ 45 ], a greater motivation to display fair behaviors with the students [ 46 ], and a greater development of these aspects in the long term [ 47 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%