Abstract:Purpose:The purpose of this study was to validate the Vocational Rehabilitation Engagement Scale (VRES) for use in the Clubhouse Model of Psychosocial Rehabilitation.Method:There were 124 individuals with serious mental illness recruited from 8 Clubhouse programs in Hawaii. Measurement structure of the VRES was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis.Results:Exploratory factor analysis of the Clubhouse version of the VRES yielded 2 reliable factors (cognitive-affective engagement and behavioral engagement)… Show more
“…Each item is rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Using the VRES with clients with mental illness in clubhouse settings, Fitzgerald et al (2016) reported an internal consistency reliability coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) of .86. The Cronbach's alpha for the VRES in this study was .95.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autonomy. The Behavioral Regulation in Work Questionnaire (BRWQ) was adapted from the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2 (BREQ-2; Markland & Tobin, 2004) by Fitzgerald et al (2016) to assess controlled motivation and autonomous motivation to obtain and retain employment. The BRWQ-Brief extracts two identified regulation items (e.g., "I want to work because I value the social and financial benefits of work") and two intrinsic regulation items (e.g., "I want to work because it is fun") to form a four-item Autonomous Work Motivation measure.…”
Section: Set/sdt Predictorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, internal motivation has also been found to have a strong effect on engagement in treatment and services (Corrigan et al, 2012; Fitzgerald et al, 2015; Tansey et al, 2017). Rehabilitation researchers have identified self-determination and autonomous choice as factors that encourage persons with disabilities to be self-motivated and to participate actively in all aspects of VR services (Corrigan et al, 2012; Dutta et al, 2017; Fitzgerald et al, 2015, 2016; Iwanaga et al, 2019; Tansey et al, 2017; Wagner & McMahon, 2004).…”
Although gainful employment is associated with health and well-being, people with chronic illness and disability may be ambivalent about the prospects of working. As a result, those who might benefit from vocational rehabilitation (VR) services do not always fully engage in those services. Limited motivation toward participating may be due to factors related to self-determination and autonomous choice. Rehabilitation counseling researchers are beginning to test Deci and Ryan’s self-determination theory (SDT), along with Bandura’s self-efficacy theory (SET), as a work motivation model in VR. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate SDT and SET constructs as predictors of VR engagement in a sample of VR clients, using hierarchical regression analysis. After controlling for the effects of demographic variables and person–environment (P-E) contextual factors, SDT and SET predictors were found to account for an increase of 40% in the variance explained in VR engagement. Working alliance was the single strongest predictor of VR engagement, followed by job performance self-efficacy and autonomy supportive climate. Interventions to enhance counselor skills to promote working alliance, in addition to vocational training to increase job performance self-efficacy of rehabilitation clients, may strengthen motivation to engage in VR services, leading to better employment outcomes.
“…Each item is rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Using the VRES with clients with mental illness in clubhouse settings, Fitzgerald et al (2016) reported an internal consistency reliability coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) of .86. The Cronbach's alpha for the VRES in this study was .95.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autonomy. The Behavioral Regulation in Work Questionnaire (BRWQ) was adapted from the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2 (BREQ-2; Markland & Tobin, 2004) by Fitzgerald et al (2016) to assess controlled motivation and autonomous motivation to obtain and retain employment. The BRWQ-Brief extracts two identified regulation items (e.g., "I want to work because I value the social and financial benefits of work") and two intrinsic regulation items (e.g., "I want to work because it is fun") to form a four-item Autonomous Work Motivation measure.…”
Section: Set/sdt Predictorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, internal motivation has also been found to have a strong effect on engagement in treatment and services (Corrigan et al, 2012; Fitzgerald et al, 2015; Tansey et al, 2017). Rehabilitation researchers have identified self-determination and autonomous choice as factors that encourage persons with disabilities to be self-motivated and to participate actively in all aspects of VR services (Corrigan et al, 2012; Dutta et al, 2017; Fitzgerald et al, 2015, 2016; Iwanaga et al, 2019; Tansey et al, 2017; Wagner & McMahon, 2004).…”
Although gainful employment is associated with health and well-being, people with chronic illness and disability may be ambivalent about the prospects of working. As a result, those who might benefit from vocational rehabilitation (VR) services do not always fully engage in those services. Limited motivation toward participating may be due to factors related to self-determination and autonomous choice. Rehabilitation counseling researchers are beginning to test Deci and Ryan’s self-determination theory (SDT), along with Bandura’s self-efficacy theory (SET), as a work motivation model in VR. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate SDT and SET constructs as predictors of VR engagement in a sample of VR clients, using hierarchical regression analysis. After controlling for the effects of demographic variables and person–environment (P-E) contextual factors, SDT and SET predictors were found to account for an increase of 40% in the variance explained in VR engagement. Working alliance was the single strongest predictor of VR engagement, followed by job performance self-efficacy and autonomy supportive climate. Interventions to enhance counselor skills to promote working alliance, in addition to vocational training to increase job performance self-efficacy of rehabilitation clients, may strengthen motivation to engage in VR services, leading to better employment outcomes.
“…The Vocational Self-Efficacy Scale (VSES; Fitzgerald et al, 2016) was used to assess participants vocational self-efficacy. The VSES is an adaptation of the Life Skills Inventory (LSI; Chan et al, 2003) that evaluated the life essential skills for assertive community living and work.…”
BACKGROUND: Prior research has investigated the engagement process of vocational rehabilitation (VR) consumers yet limited understanding about transition-age Hispanic youth VR consumers remains. OBJECTIVE: This exploratory cross-sectional study evaluated the factors predicting VR engagement among transition-age Hispanic youth with disabilities who have received pre-employment transition services (pre-ETS). METHOD: Descriptive, bivariate correlation, and stepwise logistic regression analyses were conducted in this study. A total of four categories of independent variables (sociodemographic, contextual, theoretical, and pre-ETS related) were selected to investigate their relationship with VR engagement. RESULTS: Findings revealed that education level, living with family, perceived social support from friends, perceived stigma from others, VR counselors’ ability to speak Spanish, competence, vocational outcome expectancy, and number of pre-ETS received were among the significant predictors of VR engagement, with the final model explaining a total of 87.6% of the variance. CONCLUSION: Findings of this study can help inform practices and policies to bridge the gap surrounding the service delivery and utilization of VR services among transition-age Hispanic youth with disabilities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.