2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2019.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of the Hoarding Disorder-Dimensional Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study provides preliminary evidence to suggest that paper‐and‐pencil and online administrations of the SPD‐D can be used interchangeably, as strong correlations were found between these two forms of administration. This finding is consistent with other studies that have shown equivalence across paper‐and‐pencil and online administration formats when measuring OCRDs using a similar methodology (Carey, del Pozo de Bolger, & Wootton, 2019; Cheyne, Del Pozo de Bolger, & Wootton, 2018; Macfarlane et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present study provides preliminary evidence to suggest that paper‐and‐pencil and online administrations of the SPD‐D can be used interchangeably, as strong correlations were found between these two forms of administration. This finding is consistent with other studies that have shown equivalence across paper‐and‐pencil and online administration formats when measuring OCRDs using a similar methodology (Carey, del Pozo de Bolger, & Wootton, 2019; Cheyne, Del Pozo de Bolger, & Wootton, 2018; Macfarlane et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Third, the low response rate for Part 2 of the study indicates that the present results may be biased towards individuals who were more invested in completing the study. Although this attrition is consistent with studies using a similar methodology (e.g., Carey et al, 2019; Cheyne, Del Pozo De Bolger, & Wootton, 2018), participants in Part 2 of the study may comprise of a different sample compared with those who only completed Part 1, and indeed those who completed both parts of the study had significantly higher scores on SPD measures than those who only completed Time 1. Therefore, future studies may wish to reimburse participants in order to retain a higher number of participants at Time 2.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Our findings contribute to the development of a CHB instrument by expanding the reliability and validity of the original English-language HRS-I for the assessment of CHB in a general population. Our CFA analysis proposed a five-item, one-factor structure for the CHRS, which is consistent with the DSM-5 and the other hoarding measurement [1,7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Thus, higher score indicates greater severity (possible range = 0-20). Previous studies have shown that the scales have good psychometric properties (Carey, del Pozo de Bolger, & Wootton, 2019;Cheyne, del Pozo de Bolger, & Wootton, 2018;LeBeau et al, 2013;Moreno-Amador, Piqueras, Rodriguez-Jimenez, Marzo, & Mataix-Cols, 2018;Storch et al, 2007).…”
Section: Obsessive-compulsive and Related Disorders Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 99%