Psychometric properties of the excoriation (skin‐picking disorder) dimensional scale

Russell, Angela; Bolger, Andrea del Pozo de; Moses, Karen; Luo, Aileen; Wootton, Bethany M.

doi:10.1111/cp.12207

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 28 publications

(52 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, good convergence was found between the scores of the SPIS and the SPS-R, which indicates a direct and strong relationship between both scales and a good validity of the Spanish version of the SPIS. These results are consistent with the existing literature (15,24).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 94%

The Spanish version of the Skin Picking Impact Scale (SPIS) and its Short form (SPIS-S)

Barrios¹,

Jafferany²,

Diáz³

et al. 2021

Medicina Clínica Y Social

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The Skin Picking Impact Scale (SPIS) is a self-report rating scale that assess the psychosocial impact of excoriation disorder. In this study the SPIS was translated into Spanish and its reliability was measured. Similarly, its short version (SPIS-S) has been translated and tested. Methodology: The recruitment has been performed through a survey launched on social media. All subjects were older than18 years and self-reported being diagnosed with an excoriation disorder. 281 individuals were rated for the validation analysis. SPIS has been translated into Spanish and validated through an. Exploratory and confirmatory factorial analysis. Participants have been also scored with the Skin Picking Scale-Revised (SPS-R). Results: On factor at the exploratory factorial analysis has a raw eigenvalue greater than 1, with 65.5% of total variance. The confirmatory analysis confirmed that the scale is one-dimensional. Cronbach’s alpha also confirmed a good internal consistency (?=0.934 for the SPIS and ?=0.882 for the SPIS-S). Scores between the two scales (SPIS and the SPS-R) have shown a good convergence (r=0.592, p<0.0001). Conclusion: The Spanish version of SPIS and its short version show good psychometric properties and adequately reproduce the one-dimensional model of the original English version.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 94%

The Spanish version of the Skin Picking Impact Scale (SPIS) and its Short form (SPIS-S)

Barrios¹,

Jafferany²,

Diáz³

et al. 2021

Medicina Clínica Y Social

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We expanded the OCRD-D developed by LeBeau et al (24). Several studies have shown that the original measure and its domains/modules have good psychometric properties (24,(27)(28)(29). Further, OCRD-D has been validated in Spanish adolescents and exhibited good psychometric properties (30).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring symptoms of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders using a single dimensional self-report scale

Moreno-Amador

Piqueras²,

Rodríguez-Jiménez³

et al. 2023

Front. Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundObsessions and compulsions are heterogenous but can be classified into obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), body dysmorphic disorder (BDD), hoarding disorder (HD), hair-pulling disorder (HPD), and skin-picking disorder (SPD). OCD is in itself heterogenous, with symptoms clustering around four major symptom dimensions: contamination/cleaning, symmetry/ordering, taboo obsessions, and harm/checking. No single self-report scale captures the full heterogeneity of OCD and related disorders, limiting assessment in clinical practice and research on nosological relations among the disorders.MethodsTo provide a single self-report scale of OCD and related disorders that respects the heterogeneity of OCD, we expanded the DSM-5-based Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders-Dimensional Scales (OCRD-D) so that is also includes the four major symptom dimensions of OCD. A psychometric evaluation and an exploration of the overarching relations among the dimensions were conducted using an online survey which was completed by 1,454 Spanish adolescents and adults (age span = 15–74 years). Approximately 8 months after the initial survey, 416 participants completed the scale again.ResultsThe expanded scale showed excellent internal psychometric properties, adequate test-retest correlations, known groups validity, and correlations in the expected directions with well-being, depression/anxiety symptoms, and satisfaction with life. The higher-order structure of the measure indicated that harm/checking and taboo obsessions formed a common disturbing thoughts factor and that HPD and SPD formed a common body-focused repetitive behaviors factor.ConclusionThe expanded OCRD-D (OCRD-D-E) shows promise as a unified way to assess symptoms across the major symptom dimensions of OCD and related disorders. The measure may be useful in clinical practice (e.g., screening) and research, but more research on construct validity, incremental validity, and clinical utility is needed.

show abstract

“…The present study aims to measure the psychometric properties of the GAD-D in a community sample of Australian adults. Establishing these psychometric properties using an Australian sample would give clinicians working in Australia an empirical basis for using this scale to screen for, measure, and monitor GAD symptomology and severity in the populations they work with and will also add to the growing literature demonstrating the psychometric properties of the DSM-5 dimensional scales in the Australian population [ 17 – 20 ]. The following were investigated: 1) factor structure; 2) reliability; and 3) convergent and discriminant validity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric properties of the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Dimensional Scale in an Australian sample

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Generalised Anxiety Disorder Dimensional Scale is a new measure of generalised anxiety disorder developed to assist clinicians in the dimensional assessment of generalised anxiety disorder by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (Fifth Edition) Anxiety, Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum, Posttraumatic, and Dissociative Disorder Work Group. This study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of the scale in an Australian community sample. A sample of 293 Australians (72.7% female) aged between 18 and 73 (M = 28.31 years; SD = 12.11 years) was recruited. Participants completed the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Dimensional Scale, as well as related measures used to assess convergent and discriminant validity. A small proportion of the sample (n = 21) completed the scale a second time to assess test-retest reliability. The scale demonstrated a unidimensional factor structure, good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .94), good test-retest reliability (ICC = .85), good convergent validity with the Generalised Anxiety Disorder– 7 item (rs = .77), and discriminant validity with the Panic Disorder Severity Scale–Self Report (rs = .63). The scale appears to be a reliable and valid measure of generalised anxiety disorder symptomology for use in the Australian population.

show abstract

Psychometric properties of the excoriation (skin‐picking disorder) dimensional scale

Cited by 3 publications

References 28 publications

The Spanish version of the Skin Picking Impact Scale (SPIS) and its Short form (SPIS-S)

The Spanish version of the Skin Picking Impact Scale (SPIS) and its Short form (SPIS-S)

Measuring symptoms of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders using a single dimensional self-report scale

Psychometric properties of the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Dimensional Scale in an Australian sample

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About