2020
DOI: 10.32598/sija.15.3.61.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Properties of Persian Version of the Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire (MBSRQ) Among Iranian Elderly

Abstract: Objectives: This research aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire (MBSRQ) among older Iranian people. Methods & Materials: The research method was non-experimental research that its necessary information was collected with the cross-sectional method. The statistical population comprised all older people over 60 years of age in Tehran City, Iran. The statistical sample included 1035 people who have completed the Multid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The internal consistency obtained is consistent with the versions in Greek (α = 0.76 to 0.86) [48], Iranian (α > 0.75) [55], Brazilian (α = 0.73 to 0.90) [52], Spanish (α = 0.73 to 0.84) [51], French (α = 0.66 to 0.88) [47] and German (α = 0.78 to 0.90) [46]. Reliability has been estimated for each scale since the instrument is conceived as multidimensional, as the author points out: "Because this is a multidimensional assessment, researchers should not attempt to combine the various scales into a single measure" [41].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The internal consistency obtained is consistent with the versions in Greek (α = 0.76 to 0.86) [48], Iranian (α > 0.75) [55], Brazilian (α = 0.73 to 0.90) [52], Spanish (α = 0.73 to 0.84) [51], French (α = 0.66 to 0.88) [47] and German (α = 0.78 to 0.90) [46]. Reliability has been estimated for each scale since the instrument is conceived as multidimensional, as the author points out: "Because this is a multidimensional assessment, researchers should not attempt to combine the various scales into a single measure" [41].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The psychometric properties of the Brazilian adaptation were tested with a sample of 1005 participants, highlighting that this version has the same factorial structure as the original MBSRQ-AS [52]. Likewise, adaptations and psychometric analyzes of the Persian version have been carried out in 251 Iranian women with polycystic ovary syndrome [55,56], with the aim of translating and evaluating the psychometric properties of the inventory, concluding from a confirmatory factor analysis a good fit index for the five factors, thus confirming the factor structure of the MBSRQ-AS. Additionally, exploratory factor analysis studies of the MBSRQ-AS inventory with a Malaysian population of 629 adults found a reduction in the four dimensions, even though one factor had less-than-adequate internal consistency; therefore, this factor was omitted, resulting in a solution of 3 factors and 23 items [50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its validity was evaluated by Brown et al [ 26 ] and reliability was reported to be 0.81. Additionally, a correlation coefficient above 0.75 for all dimensions was obtained in the Iranian context [ 27 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internal consistencies of the subscales of the original scale ranged from 0.76 to 0.86 [ 32 , 33 ]. The reliability of the Persian version of the MBSRQ-AS was also confirmed by a Cronbach’s alpha of the total scale of 0.83 [ 34 ] and 0.98 [ 35 ]. In this study, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the total scale was 0.92.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%