Psychometric Properties of Croatian and Slovenian Short Form of Oral Health Impact Profile Questionnaires

Rener‐Sitar, Ksenija; Petričević, Nikola; Čelebić, Asjâ; Marion, Ljubo

doi:10.3325/cmj.2008.4.536

Cited by 61 publications

(61 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…All the inter-item correlations were positive, and none was high enough for any item to be redundant, while the item-total correlations coefficients were above the recommended threshold (0.20) for including an item in a scale, which was also confirmed by research done among Iranians [22]. The validity construction was mostly supported by the subjective criteria as in other studies [13,17,18,21,[23][24][25][26][27]. Our results only confirm previous assumptions according to which dental problems may not only be a source of pain, but may also cause emotional and physical disorders.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 78%

“…The results of our study were slightly better than those reported by Ostberg et al, whose results showed that internal consistency measured with Cronbach's alpha was 0.86 for 7 subscales and 0.88 for 14 separate items; similar results were published by Slade who reported high reliability (0.88) [19]. A slightly lower result, but still on a level considered as good or excellent internal consistency, was obtained by Ren [13,[20][21][22][23]. Substantial internal consistency of the instrument in our study was also supported by findings regarding inter-item and item-total correlations.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 61%

“…OHIP-14 score is calculated by adding up the answers of all 14 items, with the total score ranging from 0 to 56. The higher the value of score, the worse is the oral health [3,[9][10][11][12][13].…”

Section: Original Papersmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Validation of the Polish version of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14)

Skośkiewicz−Malinowska

Kaczmarek

Ziętek

et al. 2015

Adv Clin Exp Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. The Oral Health Impact is an example of a specific questionnaire used for assessing the quality of life in relation to oral health. Objectives. The aim of this study was to validate the Polish version of the original English Short-Form OHIP-14 questionnaire. Material and Methods. The Polish version of the OHIP-14 instrument had been prepared in accordance with generally accepted standards. The main study was conducted among a group of 150 subjects of both genders, aged from 35 to 91 who were randomly selected. Statistical analysis was made by STATISTICA software using the Cronbach alpha reliability test, Mann-Whitney U test, multiple comparison post-hoc test -LSD and Spearman`s correlation coefficient. Results. The total OHIP-14 score was 8.72 ± 13.39, out of which the highest value was for item 4 (uncomfortable to eat 0.89 ± 1.19). The value of the alpha Cronbach coefficient was above 0.9 for all 14 items of the OHIP-14 instrument indicating excellent internal consistency. Positive relationships between all items of the matrix of the inter-items correlation coefficients were found. The value of coefficients ranged from 0.56 to 0.90 at a significance level of p < 0.01. Construct validity was supported by the fact that oral health condition was correlated with total OHIP score. It was observed that there is a correlation between the quality of life evaluated with the OHIP-14 test and dental condition, dental needs, wearing removable dentures and self-assessment of general health and oral health condition. Conclusions. The obtained data indicated the reliability and validity of OHIP-14 instrument for the assessment of oral health-related quality of life for in Polish adult population (Adv Clin Exp Med 2015, 24, 1, 129-137).

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 78%

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 61%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Validation of the Polish version of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14)

Skośkiewicz−Malinowska

Kaczmarek

Ziętek

et al. 2015

Adv Clin Exp Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The reduced version of this instrument, the OHIP-14, was developed by Slade in 1997, and validated for use in an elderly population in Australia 5 , and in an adult population in England 6 and Scotland 7 . Furthermore, it was translated and trans-culturally adapted in ten languages 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17 , including Portuguese 12 . Its validation however, was tested specially on elderly individuals and urban populations, and its use has not been validated for rural populations speaking Latin languages.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric properties of the OHIP-14 and prevalence and severity of oral health impacts in a rural riverine population in Amazonas State, Brazil

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objectives of this study were: (1) test the psychometric properties of OHIP-14 in a rural population; and (2) compare the oral health impacts in two riverine communities in the Brazilian Amazon that were living at different distances from an urban center. Data were obtained from a cross-sectional study in a consecutive sample (n = 126). The validity was assessed through the association of OHIP with clinical and subjective variables, which showed a more significant association with: pain, caries, need of extraction or endodontic treatment; than with tooth loss, periodontal disease or need of prostheses. The stability and internal consistency were good (ICC = 0.97; Cronbach's α = 0.89). The prevalence of oral impacts was greater in the community far from the urban center [70.3 (59.9-80.7)] than in the community closer to it [44.3 (30.7-57.7)], and in women [66.7 (56.0-77.3)] in comparison with men [49.1 (35.3-62.7)]. The OHIP-14 adapted to rural populations in Amazonas State was valid, reproducible, and consistent. There was high prevalence of impacts, especially for riverine communities that lived far from urban centers.

show abstract

“…Destaca-se a utilização da variável referente à presença ou número de dentes naturais presente em 10 estudos (Gil-Montoya et al, 2013;Hsu et al, 2014;Inukai et al, 2010;Locker & Gibson, 2005;Montero et al, 2008;Motallebnejad et al, 2011;Perea et al, 2013;Pistorius et al, 2013;Wright, 2009;Thomson et al, 2006;); a presença de dentes deteriorados (cariados), perdidos ou obturados e doenças periodontais em 4 estudos (Montero et al, 2008;Montero et al, 2009;Motallebnejad et al, 2011;Thomson et al, 2006); a má oclusão avaliada em 4 estudos (Hsu et al, 2014;Rusanen et al, 2012;Sardenberg et al, 2011;Silvola et al,2012); a utilização de próteses dentárias em 3 estudos (Montero et al, 2008;Perea et al, 2013;Pistorius et al, 2013;Wright et al, 2009); a xerostomia em 2 estudos (Perea et al, 2013;Thomson et al, 2006); a dor facial em 2 estudos Zheng et al, 2011); as disfunções temporomandibulares em 3 estudos (Miettinen et al, 2012;Pereira et al, 2009;Rusanen et al, 2012) e a dor de dentes em apenas 1 estudo (Rener-Sitar et al, 2008).…”

Section: Resultsunclassified

Oral Health- Related Quality of Life Assessed in Adults: Integrative Review

Afonso¹,

Silva²

2015

Psic.,Saude & Doenças

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

___________________________________________________________________________RESUMO-As alterações da saúde oral podem afetar a alimentação, a comunicação, a interação social, o desempenho intelectual e o descanso. Ao avaliar as experiências subjetivas relacionadas com o impacto das condições de saúde oral -Qualidade de Vida Relacionada com a Saúde Oral (QdVRSO) -é possível recolher informações valiosas para melhorá-la.Esta revisão integrativa visareunir informações consistentes sobre QdVRSO com foco nos instrumentos de avaliação para adultos. As bases de dados eletrónicas consultadas foram PubMed, SciELO e B-ON com o uso dos descritores "oral health-related quality of life", "questionnaires" e "adults". Foram adotadas as recomendações propostas no guia PRISMA. As 19 publicações analisadas consistem em estudos observacionais, publicados entre 2005 e 2014, que apontam para uma diversidade de instrumentos validados empiricamente, com abordagem genérica de saúde oral (OHIP-14, OIDP, GOHAI, OHQOL) e abordagem específica (PIDAQ). Globalmente, os instrumentos revelam boa sensibilidade e validade de construto, distinguindo-se pela diversidade de domínios e de itens, que se focalizam no funcionamento físico, emocional e social. Os instrumentos são breves, de fácil compreensão e rápida administração. Centram-se no impacto negativo da saúde oral na QdV e apenas dois instrumentos (GOHAI, PIDAQ) integram simultaneamente os dois tipos de impacto. Comparativamente aos restantes instrumentos, o OHIP-14 apresenta mais versões culturais, maior versatilidade por incluir mais domínios e permite aceder a informação relativa à gravidade, extensão e prevalência dos impactos negativos percebidos, sugerindo que pode ser o mais adequado para contextos de intervenção clínica e investigação intercultural. Palavras-chave: saúde oral, qualidade de vida, instrumentos, avaliação, adultos. ___________________________________________________________________________ ORAL HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSED IN ADULTS:INTEGRATIVE REVIEW ABSTRACT -Changes in oral health can affect feeding, communication, social interaction, intellectual performance and rest. In assessing subjective experiences related to the impact of oral health conditions -Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) -valuable information can be collected with the intend of improving it. This integrative review aims to gather consistent information about OHRQoL focusing on assessment tools for adults. The electronic databases consulted were PubMed, SciELO and B-ON with the use of the descriptors "oral health-related quality of life", "questionnaires" and "adults". Recommendations proposed in PRISMA guide were adopted. The 19 assessed publications comprise observational studies published between 2005 and 2014, pointing to a diversity of instruments empirically validated, referring generic approach to oral health (OHIP-14, OIDP, GOHAI, OHQOL) and specific approach (PIDAQ).Overall, the instruments showed good _________________

show abstract

Psychometric Properties of Croatian and Slovenian Short Form of Oral Health Impact Profile Questionnaires

Abstract: Psychometric properties of OHIP-CRO14 and OHIP-SVN14 render these instruments suitable for the assessment of Oral Health Related Quality of Life in Croatia and Slovenia.

Cited by 61 publications

References 23 publications

Validation of the Polish version of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14)

Validation of the Polish version of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14)

Psychometric properties of the OHIP-14 and prevalence and severity of oral health impacts in a rural riverine population in Amazonas State, Brazil

Oral Health- Related Quality of Life Assessed in Adults: Integrative Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About