Validation of the Polish version of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14)

Skośkiewicz−Malinowska, Katarzyna; Kaczmarek, Urszula; Ziętek, Marek; Malicka, Barbara

doi:10.17219/acem/35476

Cited by 19 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 21 publications

(34 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the present study, conducted among Polish adults suffering from periodontal or oral mucosa diseases, the Cronbach's alpha value was high for each subscale (subscale 1: α = 0.924; subscale 2: α = 0.937; subscale 3: α = 0.936). Similar results were found for the validation of the Polish (α > 0.9), 18 Turkish (α = 0.91), 15 and Greek and Spanish (α = 0.90) 14,21 version of the OHIP questionnaire. Excellent internal consistency was found in the German version of OHIP-49 (α = 0.96).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 83%

“…7 Since then, this instrument has been applied in many different languages, e.g., German, 12 Italian, 13 Greek, 14 Turkish, 15 Japanese, 16 Vietnamese, 17 and Polish. 18 The original OHIP-14 is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 14 items divided into 7 dimensions: functional limitation (items 1 and 2), physical pain (items 3 and 4), psychological discomfort (items 5 and 6), physical disability (items 7 and 8), psychological disability (items 9 and 10), social disability (items 11 and 12), and handicap (items 13 and 14). The respondents answer questions regarding the frequency of the factors that have impacted their QOL in the last 12 months and their responses are recorded on a 5-point Likert scale: never -0; hardly ever -1; occasionally -2; fairly often -3; very often -4.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Validation of a modified Oral Health Impact Profile scale (OHIP-14) in patients with oral mucosa lesions or periodontal disease

Wąsacz¹,

Pac²,

Darczuk³

et al. 2019

Dent. Med. Probl.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. Now that healthcare systems have helped successfully extend the human lifespan, the next challenge is to improve the patient's quality of life (QOL), in particular health-related quality of life (HRQOL). A proper HRQOL assessment requires using reliable instruments that are well-adapted to the population. Objectives. The objective of this study was to validate a modified Polish version of the Oral Health Impact Profile scale (OHIP-14) for patients with oral mucosa lesions or periodontal disease. Material and methods. The sample consisted of 180 adults seeking highly specialized treatment at the Periodontology Department of the University Dental Clinic in Kraków, Poland. The main modification made to OHIP-14 was the inclusion of subquestions regarding the teeth (subscale 1), oral mucosa and other soft tissues (subscale 2), and dentures (subscale 3). Results. The Cronbach's alpha values were excellent for all 3 subscales (subscale 1: α = 0.924; subscale 2: α = 0.937; subscale 3: α = 0.936). In the case of subscale 1, the Kaiser criterion showed a model with 3 factors ("psychological and social limitations"; "physical limitations"; "functional limitations"), which together explained 67.1% of the variance, in the case of subscale 2-a model with 1 factor, and in the case of subscale 3-a 2-factor model ("social interactions limitations"; "basic activities disorder and personal discomfort"). Conclusions. Statistical testing demonstrated that a modified OHIP-14 questionnaire is a reliable tool for evaluating QOL in patients with periodontal or oral mucosa diseases.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 83%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of a modified Oral Health Impact Profile scale (OHIP-14) in patients with oral mucosa lesions or periodontal disease

Wąsacz¹,

Pac²,

Darczuk³

et al. 2019

Dent. Med. Probl.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Undoubtedly, the OHIP-14 is an appropriate measure for OHRQoL. It is an internationally accepted and validated instrument [11,12] regularly used in samples of seniors all over the world [17][18][19][20][21][22]. Some publications describe a higher sensitivity of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) compared to the OHIP in older populations [23,24].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Validated versions in German and Polish were available [11,12]. The questionnaire was part of the PQF.…”

Section: Oral Health-related Quality Of Lifementioning

confidence: 99%

Oral Health and Quality of Life in Old Age: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Project in Germany and Poland

Skośkiewicz−Malinowska¹,

Noack²,

Kaderali

et al. 2016

Adv Clin Exp Med

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. The process of ageing influences all dimensions of social life and personal well-being, but the influence of health on different dimensions of quality of life (QoL) among the elderly is rarely examined. Objectives. The aim of the pilot study is to test the feasibility of a comprehensive study design to evaluate general and dental health as well as QoL in a bi-national sample. In addition, this pilot study should allow for the exploration of potential interactions between QoL, socioeconomic, health and oral health variables. Material and Methods. Individuals aged 64 years and older (n = 100) from university dental clinics of the Wroclaw Medical University, Poland (n = 50) and of the University Hospital in Dresden, Germany (n = 50) were examined. The oral health status of participants was assessed by clinical examination. Socio-demographic, environmental and general health status were evaluated during the medical interview. General quality of life (GQoL) was assessed by an overall question with a visual analogue scale (VAS) from -5 (worst) to +5 (best). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) were measured with the EQ-5D and OHIP-14 questionnaires. Statistical analyses comprised Pearson's c 2 test, Wilcoxon test, linear regression model for statistical analysis and different multivariate linear regression analyses. Results. For the GQoL-VAS-Score the results for QoL measurements were 1.22 ± 2.62 (x -± SD), for EQ-5D-Score 7.45 ± 2.25 (x -± SD), and for OHIP-14-ADD-Score 11.04 ± 13.56 (x -± SD). Differences between Polish and German populations were observed. Conclusions. The study design proved to be feasible for a senior population. The overall GQoL question, EQ-5D and OHIP-14 were regarded as appropriate instruments. Subjective and objective (oral) health measures showed differences between Germany and Poland. For methodological reasons, these differences are not generalizable, but of value for study hypotheses in larger samples (Adv Clin Exp Med 2016, 25, 5, 951-959).

show abstract

“…14 One of the most commonly used assessment tools is the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) scale that consists of 49 questions, or its shortened version, which consists of 14 questions (OHIP-14). 15,16…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Does oral dryness influence quality of life? Current perspectives in elderly dental care

Skośkiewicz−Malinowska

Malicka

Ziętek

et al. 2019

Adv Clin Exp Med

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. The oral condition can functionally, socially and psychologically influence the quality of life. Oral dryness often occurs in the elderly due to the presence of systemic diseases and medications, which favors the development of many lesions and complaints, including dental caries, candidiasis, retention of full removable denture, taste disturbance and it enforces a change in nutrition. Objectives. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of oral dryness on oral health-related quality of life in older subjects. Material and methods. Five hundred subjects of both genders, aged 65 and over (mean 74.4 ±7.4) were involved in the study. Oral dryness was evaluated clinically with use of the Challacombe scale (CODS, Clinical Oral Dryness Score). The oral health-related quality of life was assessed by the Oral Health Impact Profile scale (OHIP-14). Results. Oral dryness occurred in 32.8% of subjects, most often on a mild level (29.6%). The average value of the OHIP-14 scale was 8.01 ±13.59. The regression analysis demonstrated a significant association between oral dryness and two domains of the OHIP-14 scale, i.e. functional limitation (p < 0.01) and psychological disability (p < 0.05). Conclusions. Oral dryness is substantially related to the oral health-related quality of life, which indicates the necessity of monitoring oral dryness as part of routine dental care.

show abstract

Validation of the Polish version of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14)

Cited by 19 publications

References 21 publications

Validation of a modified Oral Health Impact Profile scale (OHIP-14) in patients with oral mucosa lesions or periodontal disease

Validation of a modified Oral Health Impact Profile scale (OHIP-14) in patients with oral mucosa lesions or periodontal disease

Oral Health and Quality of Life in Old Age: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Project in Germany and Poland

Does oral dryness influence quality of life? Current perspectives in elderly dental care

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About