2016
DOI: 10.12816/0037098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Biofilm Formation and Quorum Sensing lasR Gene in Patients with Wound Infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, another study showed that the lowest antibiotic resistance was to imipenem with 7%, while the highest resistance was to amikacin-48% [37]. In another study in Egypt, it was found that most of the P. aeruginosa isolates were resistant to ceftazidime followed by levofloxacin and imipenem but with a lower resistance to amikacin [38]. The variation in the resistance rates among previous studies can be due to the differences in geographical distribution, time of sample collection, number of isolates gathered in each study, and the difference in antibiotic strategies adopted in every region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, another study showed that the lowest antibiotic resistance was to imipenem with 7%, while the highest resistance was to amikacin-48% [37]. In another study in Egypt, it was found that most of the P. aeruginosa isolates were resistant to ceftazidime followed by levofloxacin and imipenem but with a lower resistance to amikacin [38]. The variation in the resistance rates among previous studies can be due to the differences in geographical distribution, time of sample collection, number of isolates gathered in each study, and the difference in antibiotic strategies adopted in every region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, Abdelraheem et al, found that biofilm formation was observed in 27% Pseudomonas clinical isolates; 14% developed strong biofilm, 7% developed moderate biofilm, and 6% developed weak biofilm [37]. A different study in Egypt demonstrated that biofilm formation was observed in 91.4% P. aeruginosa isolates; 25.7%, 40%, 25.7%, and 8.6% of isolates were strong, moderate, weak, and nonbiofilm producers, respectively [38]. The variation in findings between different studies can be related to several variables, including the differences in type and number of strains gathered in each research study, that eventually lead to differences in the ability of isolates to produce biofilms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly studied bacteria capable of forming biofilms are A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa and S. maltophilia. Biofilm formation is important in establishing infections on different host tissues as well as different medical devices in hospital acquired infections in Egyptian hospitals ICUs [7]. In these settings, the antibiotic resistance engendered by biofilms presents a serious challenge to the treatment of nosocomial infections caused by MDR bacteria [7].…”
Section: Tissue Culture Plate Methods (Tcp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most common biofilm forming bacteria is P. aeruginosa [7]. P. aeruginosa has been extensively studied for genetic determinants that contribute to form biofilm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fold change in gene expression was normalized to the reference gene (pro C) and relative to the control sample. Then the relative expression was con rmed by using free data analysis tools [11]. PCR products were analyzed by gel electrophoresis, to exclude any unspeci c products are present.…”
Section: Rt-pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%