2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2022.107919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proton irradiation induced reactive oxygen species promote morphological and functional changes in HepG2 cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with our previous findings (33) and the literature (50,51), this pan-nuclear γH2AX signal is not linked to the induction of apoptosis (71) nor to the presence of DSBs, since, like others (50,51), we do not find 53BP1 accumulation outside the localized irradiation sites. This pan-nuclear γH2AX is likely due to a stress signal resulting from an increase in indirect DNA lesions induced by reactive species, and/or increase in the complexity or clustering of DNA damage generated by charged particle-irradiation (50,51,64,70). Nevertheless, although this γH2AX signal does not correspond to high LET IR-induced DSBs, it still directly correlates with the number of charged particles delivered during irradiation and its disappearance with the repair of DNA lesions induced by protons or α-particles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In agreement with our previous findings (33) and the literature (50,51), this pan-nuclear γH2AX signal is not linked to the induction of apoptosis (71) nor to the presence of DSBs, since, like others (50,51), we do not find 53BP1 accumulation outside the localized irradiation sites. This pan-nuclear γH2AX is likely due to a stress signal resulting from an increase in indirect DNA lesions induced by reactive species, and/or increase in the complexity or clustering of DNA damage generated by charged particle-irradiation (50,51,64,70). Nevertheless, although this γH2AX signal does not correspond to high LET IR-induced DSBs, it still directly correlates with the number of charged particles delivered during irradiation and its disappearance with the repair of DNA lesions induced by protons or α-particles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are multiple studies pointing out that irradiations with different types of particles (i.e., species, energy and linear energy transfer (LET) of particles) induce different kinds of DNA damage (64,65) with different levels of complexity (i.e., different types of DNA lesions in the same DNA region) and clustering (i.e., accumulation of DNA damage in the same DNA region) (66,67). Apart from DNA lesions directly induced by direct interaction with the DNA molecule, ionizing radiation (IR) also creates reactive species (i.e., reactive oxygen or nitrogen species, ROS or RNS) by interacting with other molecules, such as water, proteins, etc… (68)(69)(70), which then also contribute to further formation of DNA damage within irradiated cells. Computational approaches (66,67) showed that irradiations with α-particles lead to a small number of DNA damage sites with concentrated clusters of complex DNA lesions compared to irradiations with protons, which give a higher number of DNA damage sites containing less clusters of complex DNA lesions.…”
Section: Hr Is Implicated Sooner In the Processing Of Dna Lesions Ind...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Терапевтический эффект ПТ состоит в стойком повреждении генетического материала опухолевых клеток, ведущем к их гибели [6]. При этом цитотоксический эффект протонов обусловлен как прямым повреждением цепи ДНК опухолевых клеток, так и косвенным путем -за счет индукции образования активных форм кислорода [7] и стимуляции апоптоза (за счет активации каспазы-3 протонами) [8].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified