1995
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.51.1303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proton and deuteron production in neutron-induced reactions on carbon atEn=42.5, 62.7, and 72.8 MeV

Abstract: Double-differentialcross sections for proton and deuteron production in fast neutron-induced reactions on carbon are reported for three incident neutron energies: 42.5, 62.7, and 72.8 MeV. Angular distributions were measured at laboratory angles between 20 and 160 . Procedures for data taking and data reduction are presented. Energy-difFerential cross sections and total cross sections are also reported. Experimental cross sections are compared with existing data and with theoretical calculations in the frame o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The systematic error on the recoil energy measurement is due to the uncertainty in the MINERvA detector energy scale set by muons and differences between the simulated calorimetric response to single hadrons and the response measured by the test beam program. Additional uncertainties are due to differences between the Geant model of neutron interactions and thin target data on neutron scattering in carbon, iron and copper [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. We evaluate further sources of systematic error by loosening analysis cuts on energy near the vertex and on extra isolated energy depositions, repeating the fit to the background and subsequent analysis, and assigning an uncertainty to cover the difference.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systematic error on the recoil energy measurement is due to the uncertainty in the MINERvA detector energy scale set by muons and differences between the simulated calorimetric response to single hadrons and the response measured by the test beam program. Additional uncertainties are due to differences between the Geant model of neutron interactions and thin target data on neutron scattering in carbon, iron and copper [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. We evaluate further sources of systematic error by loosening analysis cuts on energy near the vertex and on extra isolated energy depositions, repeating the fit to the background and subsequent analysis, and assigning an uncertainty to cover the difference.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solid line shows the evaluated result [12] from GNASH model calculations transformed into the laboratory frame of reference; the dashed line shows the results from Brenner and Prael's calculations [38]. It is evident that the evaluated result is in good agreement with the experimental data [17,[19][20][21], with the exception of the 70 MeV proton production where the calculation underpredicts the measurement.…”
Section: A Neutron Cross Sections and Kerma Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…We also made use of neutron total non-elastic cross section measurements compiled by the NNDC [13]. Charged-particle production spectra have been particularly important for guiding and testing the calculations, principally the measurements from the University of California at Davis [17,18], Los Alamos [19], Louvain-la-Neuve [20][21][22] and Tohoku University [23].…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To satisfy these needs, a series of experiments have successfully been performed for several targets (C, O, Si, Fe, Pb, and U) at 96 MeV using the quasi mono-energetic neutron facility at the The Svedberg Laboratory (TSL) [1][2][3]. Similar light-ion production measurements have been carried in the incident energy range below 100 MeV at other facilities as well [4,5]. However, there has been no systematic measurement at energies between 100 and 200 MeV until now.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%