2020
DOI: 10.1111/eos.12744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteomic profiles of the acquired enamel pellicle formed in vitro, in situ, or in vivo

Abstract: This study compared the protein profile of the acquired enamel pellicle (AEP) formed under three conditions: in vitro, in situ, and in vivo. Nine volunteers participated in all procedures. In the in vitro condition, the volunteers donated saliva, in which specimens were incubated to form the AEP. In the in situ condition, the volunteers used an oral device containing specimens where the AEP was formed. In the in vivo condition, the AEP was collected from the volunteers own teeth. All AEPs were formed for 120 m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, a recent study by our group compared the proteomic profile of the AEP formed in vitro, in situ, and in vivo. The AEP formed in situ was similar to in vivo (Pelá et al 2020). Considering that our preventive strategy is based on AEP engineering, the results obtained in situ with this protein might be highly comparable with in vivo conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Moreover, a recent study by our group compared the proteomic profile of the AEP formed in vitro, in situ, and in vivo. The AEP formed in situ was similar to in vivo (Pelá et al 2020). Considering that our preventive strategy is based on AEP engineering, the results obtained in situ with this protein might be highly comparable with in vivo conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The qualitative profile of the proteins, especially the typical ones, is different in the in vitro condition. Furthermore, there are important quantitative differences that may interfere when attempting to extrapolate in vitro results to an in situ and in vivo condition [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results, however, should still be viewed with the caveat that this study has some limitations. Primarily, even though we used human saliva, we formed the salivary pellicle in vitro , which can be considerably different from those formed in vivo [ 44 ]. Secondly, although we used human teeth, the specimens were ground to reach a healthy (non-demineralized) layer of enamel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%