2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.kjms.2018.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prostate Health Index (PHI) improves prostate cancer detection at initial biopsy in Taiwanese men with PSA 4–10 ng/mL

Abstract: In this study, we aimed to validate the Prostate Health Index (PHI) for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa). We prospectively enrolled patients aged 50-75 years with a serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level of 4-10 ng/mL undergoing transrectal biopsy of the prostate between April 2016 and May 2017. The primary outcome was the diagnostic performance of various PSA derivatives (total PSA, free PSA, %fPSA, p2PSA, %p2PSA, and PHI) to predict PCa. The secondary outcome was comparisons of PSA derivatives bet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to solve these problems, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has been used rather than prostate ultrasound, and the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) has been used to detect prostate cancer [7]. Several models to assess the risk of prostate cancer using free PSA, free/total PSA ratio, the 4Kscore Test [8], Prostate Health Index [9], and prostate cancer antigen 3 [10] have been developed [11]. However, for diagnostic accuracy and economic benefits, particularly in the gray zone, there is controversy over the usefulness of these biomarkers [12], and prostate biopsy for confirming prostate cancer still tends to rely on volume-based PSA parameters [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to solve these problems, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has been used rather than prostate ultrasound, and the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) has been used to detect prostate cancer [7]. Several models to assess the risk of prostate cancer using free PSA, free/total PSA ratio, the 4Kscore Test [8], Prostate Health Index [9], and prostate cancer antigen 3 [10] have been developed [11]. However, for diagnostic accuracy and economic benefits, particularly in the gray zone, there is controversy over the usefulness of these biomarkers [12], and prostate biopsy for confirming prostate cancer still tends to rely on volume-based PSA parameters [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best cut-off criterion was PHI > 29.6. If this cut-off criterion had been used in the sample, 88 males would have avoided an unnecessary prostate biopsy and there would have been 8 false-negative cases (17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 At present, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels remain the most commonly used test to detect prostate cancer, and the standard and definitive diagnosis of the disease is via prostate biopsy. However, several studies [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] have reported that the serum PSA level can also be elevated in benign conditions, has limited specificity, and results in high rates of over-diagnosis and treatment of indolent prostate cancers. Furthermore, it has a low positive predictive value and results in a significant proportion of negative biopsies which often leads to repeat PSA measurements and biopsies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%