2001
DOI: 10.1080/09500340108235159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposed performance measures for imaging systems with discrete detector arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lettington et al pointed out that many imaging systems have an IRF that approximates to a Gaussian function [22]. The shape of IRF can be assumed as a Gaussianlike function [20].…”
Section: Parametric Instrument Response Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lettington et al pointed out that many imaging systems have an IRF that approximates to a Gaussian function [22]. The shape of IRF can be assumed as a Gaussianlike function [20].…”
Section: Parametric Instrument Response Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This however can be avoided by terminating the restoration once the known scene edge distribution has been achieved. The method is stable in the presence of noise and by sharpening edges and suppressing ringing it can increase the signal-to-noise ratio, which in turn can increase the probability of observers recognizing objects in the scene 19 . The previous one-dimensional algorithm 3 was adapted from Fuderer's super-resolution work 18 and produced good results for one-dimensional images.…”
Section: Lorentzian Restoration Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%