1972
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1972.tb00039.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promotive Tension: The Basis of Prosocial Behavior from a Lewinian Perspective1

Abstract: Three categories of tension are identified as potential correspondents of psychological forces: tension arising from own needs, from induced needs, from the need to satisfy impersonal demands. To these, a fourth is added in which tensions are coordinated to someone else's desire to locomote toward or away from a region in his life space. From this Lewinian perspective, altruism and other less dramatic forms of prosocial behavior are part of a general theoretical question: What conditions determine whether indi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
72
0
3

Year Published

1980
1980
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
72
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Nor can the racial bias in empathic neural responses be accounted for by in-group advantage in emotion recognition (Elfenbein and Ambady, 2002) because empathic neural responses were defined by contrasting of painful and non-painful stimuli applied to faces with neutral expressions. As race helps defining in-group/out-group members (Cosmides et al, 2003), our fMRI results support the view that shared common membership enhances a perceiver's empathic concerns for others (Hornstein, 1978). Empathy consists of both affective components (e.g., emotional sharing) and cognitive components (e.g., perspective taking) (Decety and Jackson, 2006;Fan and Han, 2008) and the ACC mainly contributes to the affective component of empathy (Singer et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nor can the racial bias in empathic neural responses be accounted for by in-group advantage in emotion recognition (Elfenbein and Ambady, 2002) because empathic neural responses were defined by contrasting of painful and non-painful stimuli applied to faces with neutral expressions. As race helps defining in-group/out-group members (Cosmides et al, 2003), our fMRI results support the view that shared common membership enhances a perceiver's empathic concerns for others (Hornstein, 1978). Empathy consists of both affective components (e.g., emotional sharing) and cognitive components (e.g., perspective taking) (Decety and Jackson, 2006;Fan and Han, 2008) and the ACC mainly contributes to the affective component of empathy (Singer et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…However, the empathic neural responses are modulated by affective link between individuals (Singer et al, 2006) and top-down attention to painful cues in stimuli (Gu and Han, 2007;Fan and Han, 2008). In addition, empathy may be influenced by social relationship between individuals such that empathic concerns increase if a perceiver and a target share common membership in a social category (Hornstein, 1978). The evidence supporting this hypothesis comes from research that measured subjective reports of empathic concern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The dependent measures questionnaire contained three distinct categories of measures of group behavior, and specific questions were selected on the basis of empirical precedent and/or theoretical notions concerning group behaviour. The conative measures were altruism (Hornstein, 1972), cooperation (Sherif, 1966), and eagerness to get to know ingroup members. Affective measures concerned trust, respect, and liking for the ingroup, and also a measure of closeness with ingroup members (cf.…”
Section: Dependent Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People are more likely to help an ingroup member than an outgroup member (Hornstein, 1978;Levine, Prosser, Evans, & Reicher, 2005;Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher, & Wetherell, 1987). The present research aims to shed light on why people display an intergroup helping bias, by examining how people's inferences about the emotional states of victims may both trigger and impede helping responses to outgroups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%