Interpersonal attraction, social identification and psychological group formation

Hogg, Michael A.; Turner, John

doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420150105

Cited by 297 publications

(239 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

214

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Sport Identification Hogg and Turner, 1985;Tajfel and Turner, 1986;Turner, 1975 Funk Hogg and Turner, 1985;Tajfel and Turner, 1986;Turner, 1975 Funk …”

Section: Gwinner and Bennett 2008 Keller 1993 Gwinner And Bennett 2008mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Study of Sponsor Fit in a Sponsorship Context of a Sport Event in Japan

Yamaguchi

Nogawa

Kitamura

et al. 2010

JJSM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to replicate the applicability of the Gwinner and Bennett model (2008) which examined the effects of brand cohesiveness and sport identification on sponsor fit in a sponsorship in a Japan context. This study analyzed also focusing on the impact of sponsor fit on two important consumer behavioral outcome; attitude toward sponsors and purchase intentions. The data were collected from 537 spectators at the HP JAPAN WOMEN'S OPEN TENNIS 2009 in Osaka. The results of study indicate that brand cohesiveness and sport identification also have strong impacts on the sponsor fit at the event. Findings also support our hypotheses that sponsor fit has a positive influence on consumers purchase intentions through the attitude toward sponsor. It can be concluded that the Gwinner and Bennett model is applicable to the sponsorship in a Japanese context.

show abstract

“…Sport Identification Hogg and Turner, 1985;Tajfel and Turner, 1986;Turner, 1975 Funk Hogg and Turner, 1985;Tajfel and Turner, 1986;Turner, 1975 Funk …”

Section: Gwinner and Bennett 2008 Keller 1993 Gwinner And Bennett 2008mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Study of Sponsor Fit in a Sponsorship Context of a Sport Event in Japan

Yamaguchi

Nogawa

Kitamura

et al. 2010

JJSM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The third principle describes social identifi cation as distinctly different from internalization ( Hogg and Turner, 1987 ). Identifi cation looks at the self in terms of social categories, whereas internalization refers to the integration of values, attitudes, and interests within the self as guiding principles.…”

Section: Social Identifi Cation Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

College Fund Raising Using Theoretical Perspectives to Understand Donor Motives

Mann

2007

Int J Educ Adv

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper provides senior leadership teams with a body of literature that will guide the development of fundraising strategy and provides an interdisciplinary context for understanding donor motives . Consideration of these theoretical foundations can help shape the fundraising philosophy of the institution. These perspectives also have practical implications on the interactions between the College and its alumni including how the College communicates with alumni or how donors are recognized for their generosity.

show abstract

“…Organizational status is carried over in determining members' status in the market. Higher organizational status also becomes a source of pride for members that differs from the respect that results from an individual's status within an organization (Hogg, 1992;Hogg & Turner, 1985;Tyler, 2001). This organizational status argument predicts that, other things being equal, the higher the status and performance expectation of an organization within an industry, the greater is its members' dependence on this aspect of cultural capital.…”

Section: Insert Figure 2 Herementioning

confidence: 99%

“…A leading social identity theorist, Hogg (1992), suggests a similar distinction by indicating that individuals' identification with social categories constitutes the minimal condition of a group, and this cannot be reduced to interpersonal attachments; psychological groups emerge through individuals' attachment to (or identification with) a group even in the absence of interpersonal relationships among its members (also see Hogg & Turner, 1985). On this view, an individual's attachment to a collective can be applied broadly to groups, organizations, communities or societies.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relational Cohesion Model of Organizational Commitment

Yoon¹,

Lawler²

2006

Relational Perspectives in Organizational Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract[Excerpt] This chapter reviews the research program of relational cohesion theory (RCT) (Lawler & Yoon, 1993, 1996, 1998Lawler et al., 2000;Thye et al., 2002) and uses it to develop a model of organizational commitment. Broadly, relational cohesion theory (RCT) has attempted to understand conditions and processes that promote an expressive relation in social exchange; an expressive relation is indicated by relational cohesion, that is, the degree to which exchange partners perceive their relationship as a unifying object having its own value. The research program argues that such relational cohesion is a proximal cause of various forms of behavioral commitment in a group setting, for example stay behavior, gift-giving and investment.In this chapter, we develop a model of organizational commitment through the following three steps: First, we review the program of relational cohesion theory (RCT) and establish the key theoretical concepts and theorems through which it explains how instrumentally motivated actors in exchange relations develop an expressive relation. Second, we apply the concepts and theorems to derive a 'relational-cohesion model' of organizational commitment. Third, we examine the heuristic value of the new model by deriving predictions with respect to several organizational phenomena to which conventional organizational commitment theories may not have paid sufficient attention. The role of emotions is highlighted and our purpose is to theorize the interrelationships of instrumental, affective and normative forms of organizational commitment.

show abstract

Interpersonal attraction, social identification and psychological group formation

Cited by 297 publications

References 37 publications

A Study of Sponsor Fit in a Sponsorship Context of a Sport Event in Japan

A Study of Sponsor Fit in a Sponsorship Context of a Sport Event in Japan

College Fund Raising Using Theoretical Perspectives to Understand Donor Motives

Relational Cohesion Model of Organizational Commitment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About