2016
DOI: 10.1155/2016/4651265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proliferation-Related Activity in Endothelial Cells Is Enhanced by Micropower Plasma

Abstract: Nonthermal plasma has received a lot of attention as a medical treatment technique in recent years. It can easily create various reactive chemical species (ROS) and is harmless to living body. Although plasma at gas-liquid interface has a potential for a biomedical application, the interactions between the gas-liquid plasma and living cells remain unclear. Here, we show characteristics of a micropower plasma with 0.018 W of the power input, generated at gas-liquid interface. We also provide the evidence of pla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…32 33,40 Interestingly, repeating indirect treatments (at 0 and 24 h after the scratch) using PAM for HaCaT (B), HMVEC (E), and 24 h after the scratch) using long-life species alone or together at a concentration corresponding treatment every 24 h did not increase mortality during a period of 72 h. This plasma source used higher power than was used in this study, and distance of source from cell viability was studied by Suzuki and Yoshino. 45 These investigators used micropower dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) as the power and a H 2 O 2 concentration that was similar to what were used in the current study: 0.018 W and 15 μ for treatment of 2 min (in our study, 0.09 W and 14 μ for 2 min). Suzuki and Yoshino found cells to be damaged after 5 min of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…32 33,40 Interestingly, repeating indirect treatments (at 0 and 24 h after the scratch) using PAM for HaCaT (B), HMVEC (E), and 24 h after the scratch) using long-life species alone or together at a concentration corresponding treatment every 24 h did not increase mortality during a period of 72 h. This plasma source used higher power than was used in this study, and distance of source from cell viability was studied by Suzuki and Yoshino. 45 These investigators used micropower dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) as the power and a H 2 O 2 concentration that was similar to what were used in the current study: 0.018 W and 15 μ for treatment of 2 min (in our study, 0.09 W and 14 μ for 2 min). Suzuki and Yoshino found cells to be damaged after 5 min of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Susceptibility of endothelial cells to plasma was also shown by Arndt et al 33 The fact that plasma toxicity is time and power dependent was described 32,39,40,41 keratinocytes, [40][41][42]44 and endothelial cells. [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] However, the power of the plasma source was not always provided in previous publications, so it is not always possible to compare the cell-damage threshold in terms of produced energy and/or equivalent production of ROS. Kang et al…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations