2000
DOI: 10.1080/00218839.2000.11101017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress ofPaenibacillus larvae larvaeinfection in individually inoculated honey bee larvae reared singlyin vitro, in micro colonies, or in full-size colonies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, these differences have been explained by differences in host tolerance and hygienic behavior of honeybees (2,3,8,9,15,16,19,20). Indeed, a study directly comparing a susceptible bee line with a resistant bee line revealed that differences between bee strains might account for a factor of 2 in the spore dose needed for causing clinical symptoms (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So far, these differences have been explained by differences in host tolerance and hygienic behavior of honeybees (2,3,8,9,15,16,19,20). Indeed, a study directly comparing a susceptible bee line with a resistant bee line revealed that differences between bee strains might account for a factor of 2 in the spore dose needed for causing clinical symptoms (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, studies addressing differences in the outcomes of AFB have only focused on aspects of host tolerance (2,3,9,15,16,20) but have neglected the possibility of variation in virulence among different strains of P. larvae subsp. larvae.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peng et al (1992) reported that they obtained 90.5% larval survival but only 74.5% survival until adult emergence. Brodsgaard et al (2000) reported 75% survival until the adults emerged. Unfortunately, in all of these reports, the amounts of food provided to the brood were not mentioned.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rearing worker bee larvae (Apis mellifera) under laboratory conditions has been done for several purposes, including studies of larval development (Michael and Abramovitz, 1955;Hoffman, 1960;Dixon and Shuel, 1963;Jay, 1964;Shuel and Dixon, 1968;Dietz, 1975;Rembold and Lackner, 1981;Vandenberg and Shimanuki, 1987), caste determination (Dietz and Haydak, 1970;Weiss, 1975;Shuel et al, 1978;Lensky, 1976, 1984;Rembold, 1987), caste determination and food consumption (Dietz and Lambremont, 1970), the effects of pathogens (Patel and Gochnauer, 1959;Gilliam et al, 1978;Vandenberg and Shimanuki, 1990;Brodsgaard et al, 1998Brodsgaard et al, , 2000, effects of antibiotics and toxicity of insecticides (Wittmann and Engels, 1980;Czoppelt and Rembold, 1988;Peng et al, 1992;Davis et al, 2000), and the impact of transgenic products (Brodsgaard et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…larvae is the only known causative pathogen of American foulbrood (AFB) (5,7,8). The disease has spread worldwide (9,10) and is causing a significant decrease in honeybee populations and significant drops of honey, pollen, propolis, royal jelly, and beeswax production (11). AFB is a highly deleterious bacterial honeybee disease that only affects the larval stages of the honeybee (2,12), with 24-to 48-h-old larvae being most susceptible to P. larvae (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%