2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Factors of Arthroscopic Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis Release for Lateral Epicondylitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
24
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
24
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These factors may be related to the severity of the condition. Other studies 12 have detected as prognostic factors the female gender, which in the present study showed no association, and the stage of the condition at resonance, not assessed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These factors may be related to the severity of the condition. Other studies 12 have detected as prognostic factors the female gender, which in the present study showed no association, and the stage of the condition at resonance, not assessed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
“… 4 , 9 , 10 , 11 The vast majority have in common the release or debridement of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) tendon. Some factors have been attributed to poor prognosis after surgical treatment, especially female gender and injury of the common extensor tendon greater than 6 mm in magnetic resonance imaging 12 ( Fig. 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,27,48 Radiofrequency microtenotomy and percutaneous or endoscopic lateral release also provide satisfactory results. 27 Although several case series have reported favorable outcomes of arthroscopic lateral elbow release, 24,25,27 2 Cochrane database reviews (2002 and 2011) found that there is still insufficient evidence to support or refute the effectiveness of surgery for lateral elbow pain, 49,50 and assessment of the pros and cons of each technique suggests that none is superior by any measure. 27 The only 2 studies that have compared surgery (open release) and PRP injection in LE are limited by a retrospective design and by the lack of outcome measures validated for elbow epicondylitis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…23 Arthroscopic or open lateral release as well as other procedures (radiofrequency microtenotomy and percutaneous or endoscopic lateral release) can be considered when conservative treatment fails to provide pain relief and functional recovery. [24][25][26][27] Arthroscopic release can provide good to excellent outcomes in line with those of other surgical approaches but has the advantage of enabling treatment of any intra-articular conditions. 27 Two recent retrospective studies of the effects of PRP injections compared with open surgical release in recalcitrant lateral elbow tendinosis have found that PRP seems to provide better pain relief and function in the short and medium term 28 and that it provides similar clinical outcomes and rates of return to work to open surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gripping is a delicate motion that occurs via the joint action of the flexors and the extensors of the wrists, not merely the action of the flexors of the hands. As grip strength increases, the extensor carpi ulnaris muscle is mobilized in addition to the already activated extensor carpi radialis brevis 12 ) . The extensor carpi radialis longus muscle and even the brachioradialis muscle can also be mobilized according to the posture during gripping and the degree of grip strength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%